instigate an in depth report by dame carol baker on how we should proceed with regards to drugs, reporting wise, but with equaljustice policy, and they sort of. the researchers who think did a very good job, it is a very good document, they categorised the sort of level of deal, if you like, from at such a street dealing come into four areas, but they note that in two of them, the key drawback is that there is serious intelligence gaps. 0ne the key drawback is that there is serious intelligence gaps. one way we can mitigate that intelligence gaps and the importance of intelligence that viewers need to understand, criminal investigations these days, particularly the proactive ones, they are what we call intelligence led. that means that we know where we are going before we do it, we are not interested in looking around on the street, that policy does not work. one way we can improve that intelligence flow, or kick it again, is by reforming a neighbourhood policing teams, becau
no intent to kill 0livia, the fatal shot was fired with the clearest possible shot was fired with the clearest possible intent to kill. i have determined that the shooting was premeditated. the fact that the intent premeditated. the fact that the intent was directed towards joseph nee offers no mitigation, had the defendant planned to kill 0livia, he would defendant planned to kill 0livia, he would have been facing a whole life order. would have been facing a whole life order. even would have been facing a whole life order. even had the defendant killed joseph order. even had the defendant killed joseph nee, ratherthan order. even had the defendant killed joseph nee, rather than 0livia, the premeditated nature of the killing, the use premeditated nature of the killing, the use of premeditated nature of the killing, the use of two mac firearms, and the firing the use of two mac firearms, and the firing of the use of two mac firearms, and the firing of a the use of two
years, as set out in paragraph three of schedule 21. i must therefore consider of schedule 21. i must therefore consider the aggravating and mitigating factors, set out in paragraphs nine and ten, together with any paragraphs nine and ten, together with any other relevant circumstances. they can be no doubt that this circumstances. they can be no doubt that this shooting involves a significant degree of planning and premeditation. i bear in mind that many. premeditation. i bear in mind that many. if premeditation. i bear in mind that many if not premeditation. i bear in mind that many, if not most murders, involving firearms, many, if not most murders, involving firearms, involve some premeditation, and that is already accounted premeditation, and that is already accounted for in the starting point. the evidence in this case demonstrates planning it going well beyond demonstrates planning it going well beyond that. the defendant had sourced beyond that. the defendant h
killed very conscious that the shot that killed 0livia was one of those aimed atjoseph killed 0livia was one of those aimed atjoseph nee, while attempting to kill him. atjoseph nee, while attempting to kill him, and was the same shot that wounded kill him, and was the same shot that wounded cheryl korbel. however, i must wounded cheryl korbel. however, i must reflect the fact that the harm caused must reflect the fact that the harm caused was not limited to killing olivia. caused was not limited to killing 0livia, but also concluded in serious 0livia, but also concluded in serious injury to other people, to other serious injury to other people, to other people. had i been sentencing the defendant for the attempted murder ofjoseph nee attempted murder of joseph nee alone. attempted murder of joseph nee alone. i attempted murder ofjoseph nee alone, i would attempted murder ofjoseph nee alone, iwould have imposed attempted murder ofjoseph nee alone, i would have i
refused been brought to court today but has refused to been brought to court today but has refused to come to be sentenced. i have directed that he should do so, but he have directed that he should do so, but he has have directed that he should do so, but he has maintained his refusal. i am therefore left with no choice but to sentence him in his absence. these to sentence him in his absence. these sentencing remarks will be made these sentencing remarks will be made available to him in writing. all five made available to him in writing. all five offences arise out of the events all five offences arise out of the events of the 22nd of august, 2022. when, events of the 22nd of august, 2022. when, armed with guns, the defendant set out when, armed with guns, the defendant sei out to when, armed with guns, the defendant set out to killjoseph knee. he lay in wait set out to killjoseph knee. he lay in wait before opening fire in a residential street. joseph nee. cc