instigate an in depth report by dame carol baker on how we should proceed with regards to drugs, reporting wise, but with equaljustice policy, and they sort of. the researchers who think did a very good job, it is a very good document, they categorised the sort of level of deal, if you like, from at such a street dealing come into four areas, but they note that in two of them, the key drawback is that there is serious intelligence gaps. 0ne the key drawback is that there is serious intelligence gaps. one way we can mitigate that intelligence gaps and the importance of intelligence that viewers need to understand, criminal investigations these days, particularly the proactive ones, they are what we call intelligence led. that means that we know where we are going before we do it, we are not interested in looking around on the street, that policy does not work. one way we can improve that intelligence flow, or kick it again, is by reforming a neighbourhood policing teams, becau
years, as set out in paragraph three of schedule 21. i must therefore consider of schedule 21. i must therefore consider the aggravating and mitigating factors, set out in paragraphs nine and ten, together with any paragraphs nine and ten, together with any other relevant circumstances. they can be no doubt that this circumstances. they can be no doubt that this shooting involves a significant degree of planning and premeditation. i bear in mind that many. premeditation. i bear in mind that many. if premeditation. i bear in mind that many if not premeditation. i bear in mind that many, if not most murders, involving firearms, many, if not most murders, involving firearms, involve some premeditation, and that is already accounted premeditation, and that is already accounted for in the starting point. the evidence in this case demonstrates planning it going well beyond demonstrates planning it going well beyond that. the defendant had sourced beyond that. the defendant h
of it misfiring. having spotted the van, he changed his clothes and conceal van, he changed his clothes and conceal his van, he changed his clothes and conceal his face before heading towards conceal his face before heading towards him, only to realise that mr nee had towards him, only to realise that mr nee had left. later, having seen the van again. nee had left. later, having seen the van again, and realising that mr nee was likely van again, and realising that mr nee was likely to remain where he was, until the was likely to remain where he was, until the end of the televised football, the defendant again changed his clothes, got into position. changed his clothes, got into position, and lay in wait. this was a targeted, planned execution attempt. it commenced in a residential street, even as mr nee ran for residential street, even as mr nee ran for his residential street, even as mr nee ran for his life, the defendant ruthlessly pursued him. he then fired ruthle
part of attempting to murderjoseph nee, as part of a attempting to murderjoseph nee, as part of a planned and sustained attack part of a planned and sustained attack involving the use of two firearms. attack involving the use of two firearms. he caused serious injuries to mr firearms. he caused serious injuries to mr nee firearms. he caused serious injuries to mr nee and came close to killing him. he to mr nee and came close to killing him. he also shot cheryl korbel, causing him. he also shot cheryl korbel, causing her him. he also shot cheryl korbel, causing her significant physical injury. causing her significant physical injury, to say nothing of the psychological scars he caused her and others. that is the basis on which he will be sentenced. the defendant is now aged 34, he is not of previous defendant is now aged 34, he is not of previous good character. any attempt of previous good character. any attempt to rely on an absence of any significant attempt to r
killed very conscious that the shot that killed 0livia was one of those aimed atjoseph killed 0livia was one of those aimed atjoseph nee, while attempting to kill him. atjoseph nee, while attempting to kill him, and was the same shot that wounded kill him, and was the same shot that wounded cheryl korbel. however, i must wounded cheryl korbel. however, i must reflect the fact that the harm caused must reflect the fact that the harm caused was not limited to killing olivia. caused was not limited to killing 0livia, but also concluded in serious 0livia, but also concluded in serious injury to other people, to other serious injury to other people, to other people. had i been sentencing the defendant for the attempted murder ofjoseph nee attempted murder of joseph nee alone. attempted murder of joseph nee alone. i attempted murder ofjoseph nee alone, i would attempted murder ofjoseph nee alone, iwould have imposed attempted murder ofjoseph nee alone, i would have i