not switched on yet. we can go back now to daniel sanford who can explain to us just the process behind these cameras being switched on, when and where that happens. having done the experimentation, the appeal court in the supreme court, the decision was made eventually last year, that we should go back and start thinking about whether there should be cameras allowed in there should be cameras allowed in the criminal courts, the crown courts, the place where the most serious cases are heard. and so eventually a decision was made. that yes, cameras should be allowed in court but only for that very last bit of the process, the final bit for thejudge passed bit of the process, the final bit for the judge passed sentence. bit of the process, the final bit for thejudge passed sentence. no cameras for the evidence, witnesses, lawyers making their arguments in court and no cameras for any of those victim impact statements that are going on at the moment at manchester crown court, bu
instigate an in depth report by dame carol baker on how we should proceed with regards to drugs, reporting wise, but with equaljustice policy, and they sort of. the researchers who think did a very good job, it is a very good document, they categorised the sort of level of deal, if you like, from at such a street dealing come into four areas, but they note that in two of them, the key drawback is that there is serious intelligence gaps. 0ne the key drawback is that there is serious intelligence gaps. one way we can mitigate that intelligence gaps and the importance of intelligence that viewers need to understand, criminal investigations these days, particularly the proactive ones, they are what we call intelligence led. that means that we know where we are going before we do it, we are not interested in looking around on the street, that policy does not work. one way we can improve that intelligence flow, or kick it again, is by reforming a neighbourhood policing teams, becau
that update, rowan. iwill come for that update, rowan. i will come back to you, i just for that update, rowan. i will come back to you, ijust paused there to get the latest from court. i wonder what this case highlights in terms of the wider problem. you have spoken about your thoughts on investigation, the challenges and your satisfaction with the outcome. more broadly, a case like this shines a spotlight on drugs and on gun crime. what is your take on the state of that in the uk at the moment and a pleasing effort to counter it? there are several issues there, if we look at the government document, and there are several issues there, if we look at the government document, and in there are several issues there, if we look at the government document, and in re-ards there are several issues there, if we look at the government document, and in re-ards to there are several issues there, if we look at the government document, and in re-ards to the there are several issues there, if we loo
taking a break and we expect to get more details imminently. thank you for that update, more details imminently. thank you for that update, rowan. more details imminently. thank you for that update, rowan. i more details imminently. thank you for that update, rowan. i will- more details imminently. thank you for that update, rowan. i will come| for that update, rowan. i will come back to you, i just for that update, rowan. i will come back to you, ijust paused there to get the latest from court. i wonder what this case highlights in terms of the wider problem. you have spoken about your thoughts on investigation, the challenges and your satisfaction with the outcome. more broadly, a case like this shines a spotlight on drugs and on gun crime. what is your take on the state of that in the uk at the moment and a pleasing effort to counter it? there are several issues there, if we look at the government document, and there are several issues there, if we look at the government docum