instigate an in depth report by dame carol baker on how we should proceed with regards to drugs, reporting wise, but with equaljustice policy, and they sort of. the researchers who think did a very good job, it is a very good document, they categorised the sort of level of deal, if you like, from at such a street dealing come into four areas, but they note that in two of them, the key drawback is that there is serious intelligence gaps. 0ne the key drawback is that there is serious intelligence gaps. one way we can mitigate that intelligence gaps and the importance of intelligence that viewers need to understand, criminal investigations these days, particularly the proactive ones, they are what we call intelligence led. that means that we know where we are going before we do it, we are not interested in looking around on the street, that policy does not work. one way we can improve that intelligence flow, or kick it again, is by reforming a neighbourhood policing teams, becau
no intent to kill 0livia, the fatal shot was fired with the clearest possible shot was fired with the clearest possible intent to kill. i have determined that the shooting was premeditated. the fact that the intent premeditated. the fact that the intent was directed towards joseph nee offers no mitigation, had the defendant planned to kill 0livia, he would defendant planned to kill 0livia, he would have been facing a whole life order. would have been facing a whole life order. even would have been facing a whole life order. even had the defendant killed joseph order. even had the defendant killed joseph nee, ratherthan order. even had the defendant killed joseph nee, rather than 0livia, the premeditated nature of the killing, the use premeditated nature of the killing, the use of premeditated nature of the killing, the use of two mac firearms, and the firing the use of two mac firearms, and the firing of the use of two mac firearms, and the firing of a the use of two
demonstrated no remorse. his failure to come demonstrated no remorse. his failure to come into demonstrated no remorse. his failure to come into court is perhaps further to come into court is perhaps further evidence of that, although i make further evidence of that, although i make it further evidence of that, although i make it clear that this has not caused make it clear that this has not caused me to increase his sentence. the defendant is a father and i accept the defendant is a father and i accept that being taken away from his children is a loss for him and for them. his children is a loss for him and for them. it his children is a loss for him and forthem. it is his children is a loss for him and for them. it is a loss that he is wholly for them. it is a loss that he is wholly responsible for. there is, in myjudgment, no real mitigation available myjudgment, no real mitigation available to the defendant. i now pronounce available to the defendant. i now pro
statement from the judge, talking through the events of that night. we had a discussion about any potential mitigation, basically thejudge finding that there is no real mitigation in this instance. let us cross to our correspondent who was listening to all of that from the crown court. what you did you make of that? ., , , , ., of that? there were gasps and members of that? there were gasps and members of of that? there were gasps and members of olivia s of that? there were gasps and members of olivia s family - of that? there were gasps and j members of olivia s family are crying in the public gallery in court, as some police officers are also tearful, as the judge handed down the comments and the sentence of 42 years, a significant uplift on the 30 year minimum that thomas cashman could have faced. i think that reflects the relentlessness and the ruthlessness of the attack that the ruthlessness of the attack that the judge so that thomas cashman carried out, the nature of the p
part of attempting to murderjoseph nee, as part of a attempting to murderjoseph nee, as part of a planned and sustained attack part of a planned and sustained attack involving the use of two firearms. attack involving the use of two firearms. he caused serious injuries to mr firearms. he caused serious injuries to mr nee firearms. he caused serious injuries to mr nee and came close to killing him. he to mr nee and came close to killing him. he also shot cheryl korbel, causing him. he also shot cheryl korbel, causing her him. he also shot cheryl korbel, causing her significant physical injury. causing her significant physical injury, to say nothing of the psychological scars he caused her and others. that is the basis on which he will be sentenced. the defendant is now aged 34, he is not of previous defendant is now aged 34, he is not of previous good character. any attempt of previous good character. any attempt to rely on an absence of any significant attempt to r