instigate an in depth report by dame carol baker on how we should proceed with regards to drugs, reporting wise, but with equaljustice policy, and they sort of. the researchers who think did a very good job, it is a very good document, they categorised the sort of level of deal, if you like, from at such a street dealing come into four areas, but they note that in two of them, the key drawback is that there is serious intelligence gaps. 0ne the key drawback is that there is serious intelligence gaps. one way we can mitigate that intelligence gaps and the importance of intelligence that viewers need to understand, criminal investigations these days, particularly the proactive ones, they are what we call intelligence led. that means that we know where we are going before we do it, we are not interested in looking around on the street, that policy does not work. one way we can improve that intelligence flow, or kick it again, is by reforming a neighbourhood policing teams, becau
no intent to kill 0livia, the fatal shot was fired with the clearest possible shot was fired with the clearest possible intent to kill. i have determined that the shooting was premeditated. the fact that the intent premeditated. the fact that the intent was directed towards joseph nee offers no mitigation, had the defendant planned to kill 0livia, he would defendant planned to kill 0livia, he would have been facing a whole life order. would have been facing a whole life order. even would have been facing a whole life order. even had the defendant killed joseph order. even had the defendant killed joseph nee, ratherthan order. even had the defendant killed joseph nee, rather than 0livia, the premeditated nature of the killing, the use premeditated nature of the killing, the use of premeditated nature of the killing, the use of two mac firearms, and the firing the use of two mac firearms, and the firing of the use of two mac firearms, and the firing of a the use of two
demonstrated no remorse. his failure to come demonstrated no remorse. his failure to come into demonstrated no remorse. his failure to come into court is perhaps further to come into court is perhaps further evidence of that, although i make further evidence of that, although i make it further evidence of that, although i make it clear that this has not caused make it clear that this has not caused me to increase his sentence. the defendant is a father and i accept the defendant is a father and i accept that being taken away from his children is a loss for him and for them. his children is a loss for him and for them. it his children is a loss for him and forthem. it is his children is a loss for him and for them. it is a loss that he is wholly for them. it is a loss that he is wholly responsible for. there is, in myjudgment, no real mitigation available myjudgment, no real mitigation available to the defendant. i now pronounce available to the defendant. i now pro
intent to do grievous bodily harm to another, the sentence is ten years imprisonment, and on counts four and five, imprisonment, and on counts four and five. the imprisonment, and on counts four and five, the firearms offences, the sentence five, the firearms offences, the sentence is 18 years imprisonment on each. sentence is 18 years imprisonment on each. all sentence is 18 years imprisonment on each. all of sentence is 18 years imprisonment on each. all of those sentences are to be served each. all of those sentences are to be served concurrently, meaning that the shortest period of the defendant will be the shortest period of the defendant will be required to serve, before he can be will be required to serve, before he can be considered for early release from can be considered for early release from the can be considered for early release from the sentence of life imprisonment, is 42 years, less 182 days he has served on remand. after having days he has served o
firearms. i will select a figure towards firearms. i will select a figure towards the upper end of the range. in towards the upper end of the range. in its towards the upper end of the range. in its setting a minimum term to be served in its setting a minimum term to be served on in its setting a minimum term to be served ona in its setting a minimum term to be served on a discretionary life sentence served on a discretionary life sentence for the notion should be discounted for a. one third privation. discounted for a. one third privation, which would apply to a determinate sentence. i need not dwell determinate sentence. i need not dwell further on the minimum term for count dwell further on the minimum term for count two, since it will make no practical for count two, since it will make no practical difference to the minimum term which practical difference to the minimum term which must be served, which will be term which must be served, which will be that term whi