When he was chair. Told them hem and that fisa was not used of thely, that the power government overstretched their the other ven when elements of government says, no, even when others told us everything was fine with fisa, it was not until the Inspector General got his report and the truth was known. And i want to thank congressman nunes for being the truth and telling it to the American Public and staying with it when others wanted to lie. Thats why we are here today. Thats why this will never continue or happen again. You know, madam speaker, at the heart of our constitution is a simple idea, the idea of checks and balances. These principles protect americans freedoms by providing safeguards by governments overreach of power. Unfortunately in 2016, those checks and balances were not in place to stop individuals at the highest level of the f. B. I. And Justice Department from spying on carter page, an american citizen, who could have been one of us, but used the secrettive fisa court
Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, this case is about the respect for the courts precedent, four years ago the court held in holmes help the texas admitting privileges law imposed an undue burden on women seeking abortions. The louisiana law at issue here act 620 is identical to the texas law and was expressly modeled on it. After a trial, the District Court ruled act 620 unconstitutional finding no material differences between this case and hold ems health. On burden it found the act 620 would leave louisiana with just one clinic and one doctor providing abortions. At the same time, it found the act 620 would do nothing for Womens Health. In reversing the District Courts decision, the sixth circuit committed two fundamental errors in my first date used served the role of District Court and disregarded nearly all its factual findings. Second, the abaccepted legal arguments that this court rejected four years ago. Nothing, however, has changed that would justify such a legal
Case 1813 23 june medical services versus russo and the cost petition 1814 60 russo versus june medical services. Mr. Chief justice and may it please the court, this case is about the respect for the courts precedent, four years ago the court held in holmes help the texas admitting privileges law imposed an undue burden on women seeking abortions. The louisiana law at issue here act 620 is identical to the texas law and was expressly modeled on it. After a trial, the District Court ruled act 620 unconstitutional finding no material differences between this case and hold ems health. On burden it found the act 620 would leave louisiana with just one clinic and one doctor providing abortions. At the same time, it found the act 620 would do nothing for Womens Health. In reversing the District Courts decision, the sixth circuit committed two fundamental errors in my first date used served the role of District Court and disregarded nearly all its factual findings. Second, the abaccepted lega
Story. 963, this woman sherry finkbine, a student, not her real name, was featured in a life magazine article. You see her in the article. The story was about a choice her family was facing. She was pregnant. Her husband had recently traveled to europe where he acquired a drug called thalidomide. The drug you see here behind me had not been approved for use yet in the United States of america and was available in many European Countries and used to treat a number of Different Things, anxiety, insomnia and nausea. Nausea here is key. So women began taking it to aleave morning sickness. And sherry finkbines husband had been in europe and acquired these pills and brought them back home for her and shes pregnant and takes 40 of them early on in her pregnancy. She and her husband did not know that thalidomide causes birth defects but then she writes an article about the drug and found out a little bit more and called her doctor and she started to learn more about what thalidomide can do, fo
University of North Carolina at check hill professor teaches a class about expanding rights in the 1960s and 70s. Looking at womens grecian and the gay rights movement. He covers Birth Control, the equal rights amendment and the stonewall riots. I want to start with a little story. Woman sherry, which is a pseudonym, was featured in a life magazine article. The story was about a choice that her family was facing. She was pregnant. Her husband had recently traveled to europe where he acquired a drug called thought of mind. Thalidomide had not been approved for use in the United States of america but it was approved in european countries. Anxiety, insomnia, nausea. Nausea is key. Women began taking it to relieve morning sickness. Her husband had been in europe. He acquired these pills and brought them back home for her. She was pregnant, she takes about 40 of them in her pregnancy. She and her husband did not know that thalidomide causes birth defects. Then she read an article about the