Next, House Speaker nancy pelosi and Senate Minority leader chuck themer let a briefing on importance of the deferred action childhood arrivals program, and their opposition to President Trumps decision to rescind it. Good afternoon, everybody. I represent san antonio and am chair of the caucus this year. Earlr this year, i had the chance to attend the oral arguments over the future fate of daca. Of us today stand in solidarity and in support of our dream is and dreamers and Daca Recipients. They are as american as everyone of us and despite the president s attempts to slander them, speak ill of crew they are in what they represent, these folks are among the very best america has to offer. They are people who often time from a very young age as children arrived in this country, have only known the United States as their home, some who only speak the english language, all who have felt the fear of living in limbo for many years, who felt the joy in 2012 of being able to come out of the
Ranging from headaches and discomfort and sleeping to the most severe which is of course glioblastoma and brain tumors. As a cancer survive or myself, my son is a cancer survivor and my friend is battling glioblastoma and her doctors have advised her it was a result of wireless routers and cell phone towers in her neighborhood. Im asking the question about why were still having this conversation because with this evidence at lower levels, our population is at risk for serious modifications in their d. N. A. And the answer is because of a very outdated, unjust Telecommunications Act in 1996 that says that we as a population cannot resist the roll out of these highlevel small cell towers based on selfconcerns. I cant imagine a reason more important than our health to do so and the burden of proof should not fall on us to say its dangerous when the Telecommunications Companies were before the Senate Hearings and were asked how much money they had spent in determining the safety of these h
Half. Committee on the Judiciary Committee, United States house of representatives versus department of justice. U. S. Department of justice, mr. Letter counsel. Good morning your honor. May it please the court. This is a court denies the request for state and appeal for the opportunity to review the important questions of the day. The court denied that motion even though it is clear that once the grand jury secret issues are already close they cannot be undisclosed. The court denied that motion because effectively it was right on the merits. But as we explained that in her motion the District Court committed at least two serious errors of law in granting the request. Start with irreparable harm. It is the case that if we agreed with the District Court on the two prongs, the affable harm irreparable harm is not that important. I disagree. First, our contention in this case you thought we were would likely do this on the merits . What significance is it . I agree with you. In terms of t
Agree to a 100 day delay in forming a unity government. I mean our entire none of the top stories from europe including French Police dismantle a migrant camp in paris home to thousands of people a day after the government announced tough new immigration rules. Out in school some of the biggest stars in athletics to be excluded from the sports premier competition world athletics radically reshaped the Diamond League and many high profile events have been dropped. The former National Security adviser to the us President Donald Trump says hes willing to testify in the impeachment inquiry john bolton says that hell defy the white house appear in federal court and testify he is reportedly going to talk about his alarm at the Ukraine Pressure Campaign if a federal court clears the way for his appearance lets go live to washington now to syrias hadija castro can tell us more if that federal court allows him to work to testify what are the witnesses bulking going to make. Well age 3 and he wa
G. R. Funeral homes versus the equal Employment Opportunity commission. Mr. Cole . Mr. Chief justice, may it please the court, Aimee Stephens is a transgender woman, a valued employee for six years until she told her boss she was going to live and identify as a woman. When harris homes responded by firing her it discriminated against her because of her sex for three reasons, first in firing her for failing to conform to its owners explicitly stated stereotypes about how men and women should behave, it discriminated against her in the same way that Price Waterhouse discriminated against ann hopkins for failing to walk and talk more femininely. It cant be that ann hopkins would lose her case on the same facts were she transgender. Second, Harris Holmes fired her for identifying as a woman only because she was assigned a male sex at birth. In doing so, it fired her for controvening only people assigned a male sex at birth namely that they live as a male their entire lives. Second, fired f