Authorizing the release of certain grand jury materials in the case. For the u. S. Department of justice, mr. Letter. Judge rogers good morning. Good morning, your honor. The District Court, so this court could have an opportunity to review the import questions of the day. The court denied that motion, even though it is clear that once the issues are disclosed, they cannot be undisclosed. Nrungell cannot be ou afterthefact. The court denied that motion on the left because of merit, but as we explained, the District Court committed at least two serious errors of law in granting the request. Judge griffith you can start with irreparable harm. It is the case that if we agree with the District Court, the irreparable harm is not that important. Mr. Freeman i disagree with that. Our intention in the case judge griffith you thought you were likely to lose on merits . What significance is it . Mr. Freeman i agree with that. In terms of the irreparable harm , the disclosure of grand jury inform
Principle resolution and have faith in the recent Court Decisions in recent to win their day in court for all of us. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello. My name is page hudson. Im happy to be here tonight. I am have prepared comments so im just going to speak to you from my heart as a very concerned citizen who has been very steeped in this process of trying to educate our communities here in california and across the nation about the dangers of small cell closerange cellular towers. I often ponder why were still having this conversation when there are over 2,000 peer review studies that show the dramatic impact that even lower levels of three and four g are having on our population. Ranging from headaches and discomfort and sleeping to the most severe which is of course glioblastoma and brain tumors. As a cancer survive or myself, my son is a cancer survivor and my friend is battling glioblastoma and her doctors have advised her it was a result of wireless routers and c
Ignores wisdom and interrupts the essence of lifes pulsation within the universe and eternity. Just to support the appeal stance behind article 25 of the 1996 fel1996 telecommunicationst can stand behind a precautionary principle resolution and have faith in the recent Court Decisions in recent to win their day in court for all of us. Thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello. My name is page hudson. Im happy to be here tonight. I am have prepared comments so im just going to speak to you from my heart as a very concerned citizen who has been very steeped in this process of trying to educate our communities here in california and across the nation about the dangers of small cell closerange cellular towers. I often ponder why were still having this conversation when there are over 2,000 peer review studies that show the dramatic impact that even lower levels of three and four g are having on our population. Ranging from headaches and discomfort and sleeping to the most severe wh
Weve explained in our motion the District Court committed at least two serious errors of law in granting the request. Start with the it is the case, however, that we agreed with the District Court on the irreparable harm is not that important. Our contention in this case we thought that we would like to [inaudible] i agree with you that we have to show that dont agree we dont have that that the disclosure of grand jury information from a massive criminal investigation that concluded only eight months ago, there are only 25 pending criminal matters that come out of that proceedings. There are 2800 criminal grand jury subpoenas in connection directly to the material thats exactly the yes, and thats the point on our second argument that thats the committees burden to demonstrate that. Well, i suggest that the courts findings plus special counsel supports volume two, plus, what the said in the supplemental statements during oral arguments seems to specify why it thinks certain material is
In the Oakland Hills investigating a stolen car. Thats when the initial 911 call came in about the party. It was a noise complaint on lucille way. The log showed the officers remained in the Oakland Hills 90 minutes until neighbors reported a shooting. Here is the time line. Both officers left for the Oakland Hills at 8 48 p. M. At 9 19 a complaint came in. An hour later, a second complaint about the party. Then at 10 50 p. M. , calls reporting hears shots fired. Some describing the shooter carrying a mac10 or 12style gun. The first officers arrived at that home at 11 01 p. M. The future of the Immigration Program known at daca is in the hands of the Supreme Court. Justices heard arguments for daca. It allows undocumented immigrants browse to the u. S. At children to stay in the country. From coast to coast today, rallies to support daca, few in the bay area, including one at the university of San Francisco. Tim daily is there live. A strong showing today. Reporter yeah. Usf is one of