Been successful . I fully accept now that the post been successful . I fully accept now that the post office. Been successful . I fully accept now that the post office. Excuse been successful . I fully accept now that the post office. Excuse me. | that the post office. Excuse me. The post office new that, i completely accept it, personally i didnt know that, and im incredibly sorry that happened to those people into so many others. You sorry that happened to those people into so many others. Into so many others. You have received a into so many others. You have received a detailed into so many others. You have received a detailed briefing. Into so many others. You havej received a detailed briefing for into so many others. You have received a detailed briefing for the purposes received a detailed briefing for the purposes of this meeting, hadnt you . Purposes of this meeting, hadnt ou . ,. Purposes of this meeting, hadnt you . There purposes of this meeting, hadnt you . There had purpo
Office saying, we have got a team of people, 18, support level 3, that have Privileged User rights, that are not auditable and unaudited, that allow them access to the live estate to insert or amend transactions. Estate to insert or amend transactions. Yes, and that information transactions. Yes, and that information was transactions. Yes, and that information was not transactions. Yes, and that information was not shared, transactions. Yes, and that information was not shared, deeply regrettably. Can information was not shared, deeply rearettabl. , information was not shared, deeply rearettabl. ,. ,. , information was not shared, deeply regrettably regrettably. Can we go onto your evidence before regrettably. Can we go onto your evidence before the regrettably. Can we go onto your evidence before the select evidence before the select committee . At paragraphs 1000 1307. Sorry, that document can come down, you refer to your evidence before the select committee, including an e mail that
Statement in which she said she only became formally aware of the bugs and effects within the Horizon System in 2013, and prior to that she said she was aware of what she called rumblings about the system. She was pressed over when she learned of the horizon a bug. Jason beer asked her if she was aware that fujitsu had for me notified the post office of the receipts of Payments Mismatches on october 2020, she replied, she was not aware of that, she added she was not aware of a meeting between fujitsu and the post office in october 2010 to discuss the bug and she said she dont have that in 2013 and she was also asked towards the end of the session why the onus was on postmasters to prove their innocence rather than the post office to prove their guilt, she replied, i think back then the assumption was that if there was a loss in the branch, that it was the responsibility of the postmaster. Mr beer noted that there was a lot of assuming going on and she agreed. The inquiry is now taking
of what lee kane said earlier, through the problem. 13:1 in light of what lee kane said earlier, can you make plain that it doesn t appearas you make plain that it doesn t appear as if any decision was made during the course of the weekend for a long time, there was a change in the strategic approach of the government, there was a realisation that they had to be a change of approach and much more stringent measures were likely to be required, but no actual decision was made to impose a lockdown? but no actual decision was made to impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe it impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe it was impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe it was we impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe it was we had - impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe it was we had a - i would describe it was we had a conversation with the pm on the saturday