because they were never meant for public consumption in the aftermath, we were never meant to see them. but on a deeper level, whether there was a paper trail about some of these decisions, rishi sunak said basically that he didn t think there was a particular issue with that, it wasn t like he was trying to hide anything, but some of these conversations did take place in private. all this came up from an article that was written in the spectator magazine in the summer of last year, which was an interview that was done with rishi sunak at the time when he was a leadership contender. where he talked generally about how decisions were being made during the time. and i think it was quite an interesting insight into exactly that. let s hear a little bit from it now. exactly that. let s hear a little bit from it now. the author of the article says bit from it now. the author of the article says that bit from it now. the author of the article says that you bit from it now. t
a position which appears to have been agreed suggest this was not an open ended debate which led to a consistent decision. there was the ability to be able to unwind or unpick a position which had already been reached. do you agree with both those propositions or neither? obviously i didn t write the e mail, and i don t know precisely what it refers to. is it possible that i might have had a chat with the prime minister once a meeting wound up on my way back somewhere, of course that s possible. he might have said to me, that was interesting, i m thinking x, as a result of it, i don t think anything is wrong with that. i don t recall, huddle or not, it might havejust that. i don t recall, huddle or not, it might have just been that. i don t recall, huddle or not, it might havejust been him giving me a sense of where his head was at that particular moment in time. and i don t think there is anything particularly untoward about that, to be honest. as i have talked previously ab
away from the fact he is in power now, he is in charge now so there is jeopardy for rishi sunak particularly this week when he s not exactly having a great time. he wasn t in the number one job at the time but wasn t in the number one job at the time but the wasn t in the number one job at the time but the fact he now is puts jeopardy time but the fact he now is puts jeopardy on him and any of the other people jeopardy on him and any of the other pebble who jeopardy on him and any of the other people who have given evidence so far because he is still currently prime far because he is still currently prime minister and this will be watched prime minister and this will be watched closely notjust prime minister and this will be watched closely not just by members of the watched closely not just by members of the public looking at how he comes of the public looking at how he comes across, as you ve already mentioned, comes across, as you ve already mentioned, so
scientific and health advisers. obviously there is a justification for the thia system within its own parameters but was it not apparent that it was a bit of a chance as to whether or not epidemiologically it would work. there is a system in place. in would work. there is a system in lace. . would work. there is a system in lace, . . ., , would work. there is a system in lace. . u, , ., , place. in which case i would “ust oint to place. in which case i would “ust point to the fi place. in which case i would “ust point to the remarks place. in which case i would “ust point to the remarks of place. in which case i would “ust point to the remarks of the h place. in which case i would just i point to the remarks of the deputy chief medical officer on the 20th of october in the press conference where he was asked and he said this national firebreak you talk about, no i don t think it s right and i don t think it s consistent with the epidemiological picture we are sa