I want to make that clear. Our reaching power is at the board of appeals. Ive seen this all before. Im not sure i wasnt here i started with the board of appeals. Do you have replying to say about that no Public Comment additional no public here any rebuttal from the appellant anything else you 80 time to say to the board no . Inspector duffy you need to say at the board. Please come to the Program Senior at dbi they have information on the sprinklers. It is nice to connect his name with a face ive seen his name on documents. Just do update the past codes you could connect up to 5 spiritual codes and puc is the agency having jurisdictions over the delivery and supply of water thats not allow any sprinklers not one to be off the domestic supply have to run a new like that and provided accommodations meter that supplies that spiritual. Im dating myself. I mean the addition for us to allow this is not that bad. Well, i mean. Any other recommendations. Theyll have to bring it up to code. Wi
Id like to call roll at this time. Commissioner president fong commissioner Vice President richards commissioner antonini is present commissioner hillis commissioner moore we do expect commissioner wu and commissioner richards to be absent commissioners, the first item on your agenda tomes for continuance at the temple of issuance none point present im pleased to announce items 17 and 18 that under the discretionary review authorization at Temple Street the discretionary review and case no. 2015 plus discretionary review have both been withdrawn if there arent any questions moving to consent calendar are considered to be routine and may be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the commission. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the commission, the public, or staff so requests removed from the consent calendar and considered as a separate item at this or a future hearing. Item o1 at 19th avenue excuse me. Conditional use authorization i there are no
Im sort of looking at the items in case anyone has a comment. Mr. Collier if you have any additional thoughts id like to hear them im sorry i dont have the ordinance in front of me but we have the language disabled or ellis act who have lived there 10 years or longer were not removing them because basically, the defines of the disabled is a prosecution against ventilation so the realizing i ellis give us extent tenancy. So but those for the purpose nevertheless, suffer from a disability and need preference so as long as those people get it for 10 years and are indicate tropical ill to get it thats fine but to be disabled to the point you cant work and suffer from lifethreatening illnesses that max makes you indicating trop tropicly ill and nates thats why the time period is shortened to 10 years. I want to make sure people still get the preference just so i understand things clearly all the folks for 10 years for individuals who have been suffering from a lifethreatening illnesses as a
To step back and found a way to streamline all the dings to take care of all our seniors. We want to include that language referencing administrator code 37. 9 i ill take that as a motion can we take those without objection . And just the last thing i want to say hopefully well move this out of committee. I want to thank the leadership all of you who have worked with us our this year tablet leadership has worked with my colleagues in making sure we have 10 protections and worked on legislation to streamline work board legislation to make sure there are more monies for probone services. We need to do more. I want to thank all my colleagues. Many of us continue to look at another issues to address the changes our city is fatiguing right now. So those of you who have been put in impossible situations well hopefully pass to legislation out of this legislation today but the fight will continue thank you. Okay. Colleagues is there any additional any comments or questions. So, now weve adapte
Working and if we need to make adjustment we can go forward and do that. Let me ask the City Attorney and department is there any thing else you want to add to those comments mr. Chewing im with the Mayors Office housing development. The only item that might be taken up for additional discussion we are that going to clarify the language in the proposed legislation regarding the requirement that tenant can violative if their suffering from a lifethreatening disease they can live in the opt up to 5 years. This is for our office because it seems as if that standard is slightly different from the standard currently administered by the rent board for people disabled from the move in. I understand its a different kind of ellis lawns it looks like their language for someone that is disabled is slightly different. For us its a policy decision whether or not we want to create the same decision. I wanted to bring that to the committees attention to for the protocol if its slightly different for