Sunshine ordinance not in the bt or state law. It keeps coming up and so attorney can file an action for declaratory relief. Mr. Harts can file a motion to file on this break. Well, the Sunshine Task force can file something. And the Sunshine Task force could. Seems to me that we shouldnt have to deal with the issue. I think theres, as i hear it, theres matter to what mr. Heart is saying. Theres a practical matter so long as you identify it as the subject where that was. It makes some sense. But it seemed like were wasting a lot of time on it and let the Sunshine Task force or the City Attorney get a legal opinion on it. Commissioner im looking at agenda item number 5, page 18 the letter of september 28, 2016 to the Sunshine Ordinance Task force from mrs. Cavillo the clerk of the board, giving a reason why the 150word summary is not included. The clerk can validate whether Public Comment was made like a brief statement in the public section statement the clerk cannot attest to the 150w
Present. Vice chair chiu. Present. Commissioner kopp. Here. Commissioner lee. Here. All right, everyone is here, so lets go to Public Comment on matters appearing or not appearing on the agenda. Agenda. Yes. Go ahead and just in order. Hi, im [inaudible] i wanted to add something on behalf of mr. Bush for the record, he wanted me to read the editorial that appeared in the chronicle regarding the last meeting when the commission decided not to send the measure to the board of supervisors pending further work. The editorial was titled osf ethics board fays to tackle money and politics. It appeared september 27th in the conical. It chronicle. It realdz they had a chance to pass a common sense measure to curtail money and politics. It failed. It would have banned the practice of allowing political donors to contribute to the charitable causes of favorable candidates when they have a land decision in front of city officials. Such arrangements are common place and stink to high heaven. As cr
Manufacturing in cities creates this perfect platform for people to earn livelihoods and for people to create more economic prosperity. Im kate sosa. Im cofounder and ceo of sf made. Sf made is a Public Private partnership in the city of San Francisco to help manufacturers start, grow, and stay right here in San Francisco. Sf made really provides wraparound resources for manufacturers that sets us apart from other Small Business support organizations who provide more generalized support. Everything we do has really been developed over time by listening and thinking about what manufacturer needs grow. For example, it would be traditional things like helping them find capital, provide assistance loans, help to provide Small Business owners with education. We have had some great experience doing what you might call pop ups or temporary selling events, and maybe the most recent example was one that we did as part of sf made week in partnership with the city Seas Partnership with Small Busi
Changes and significant changes about very what you see as very big problems, when you use a sledgehammer instead of a tiny point, you can do more damage in the effect you have on the smaller nonprofits who are already monitored or already account for every penny we spend in our monitoring and our contracts and everything that you do. When you begin adding more layers of accountablity for very small things because youre trying to get at a very big target, you do more harm than good, so id ask you to keep that in mind. We appreciate the time and effort thats gone into all of this, the changes that were listened to and thoughtfully put into the document you have before you. We have debbie my colleague, debbie, indicated we still have concerns about a number of the items, but we would hope, at this point, you would be ready to move this onto the board and let them take care of the finetuning. Thank you. President keane thank you. My name is january masoca. Im the director of the Californi
November , and thats satisfied. I think this, mr. Chairman, ought to be on the january calendar, and the way that miss pelham is scheduling these matters, its for discussion and or vote, correct. Yes. Again, its up to the commissioner direction as to what you would like to see. So i have a process direction to the city attorney. As this item is agendaized, is it and i think staff is asking for policy direction, so could we discuss im assuming the answer is yes, but i wanted to clarify. Could we discuss, as a body, whether or not as a policy matter we wanted to pursue this item now . We dont have to wait until the january meeting to discuss it . Well, i mean, it sounds like the questions are sort of how you want to proceed from a priority perspective, so you know, i think you could give advice about how how you wanted staff to, you know, to prioritize the different item. , and i think also, just some substantive discussion, as well. Thank you. So if we could, you know, on this item you