Manufacturing in cities creates this perfect platform for people to earn livelihoods and for people to create more economic prosperity. Im kate sosa. Im cofounder and ceo of sf made. Sf made is a Public Private partnership in the city of San Francisco to help manufacturers start, grow, and stay right here in San Francisco. Sf made really provides wraparound resources for manufacturers that sets us apart from other Small Business support organizations who provide more generalized support. Everything we do has really been developed over time by listening and thinking about what manufacturer needs grow. For example, it would be traditional things like helping them find capital, provide assistance loans, help to provide Small Business owners with education. We have had some great experience doing what you might call pop ups or temporary selling events, and maybe the most recent example was one that we did as part of sf made week in partnership with the city Seas Partnership with Small Busi
And it has to do with supervisor cohen excuse me, supervisor kim who is going to address us and present a substitute draft of her proposed Campaign Finance legislation and is requestingn of her proposed Campaign Finance legislation and is requesting that we meet to advance her proposals in this regard. Supervisor kim, nice to have you with us. Please proceed. Thank you, chair keane, and thank you to the Ethics Commission. I will do my best to be brief because i likely know that you have a long meeting ahead of you. So i wanted to come and present an ordinance that i first have introduced in july of this year and have recently introduced the second this month, but first, i just want to take a moment to thank the Ethics Commission staff, both the director and also your Public Policy team, kyle and patrick, for really spending almost the entire year working with us on this ordinance, since january. My interest in helping to strengthen our disclosure and transparency requirements is really
Changes and significant changes about very what you see as very big problems, when you use a sledgehammer instead of a tiny point, you can do more damage in the effect you have on the smaller nonprofits who are already monitored or already account for every penny we spend in our monitoring and our contracts and everything that you do. When you begin adding more layers of accountablity for very small things because youre trying to get at a very big target, you do more harm than good, so id ask you to keep that in mind. We appreciate the time and effort thats gone into all of this, the changes that were listened to and thoughtfully put into the document you have before you. We have debbie my colleague, debbie, indicated we still have concerns about a number of the items, but we would hope, at this point, you would be ready to move this onto the board and let them take care of the finetuning. Thank you. President keane thank you. My name is january masoca. Im the director of the Californi
November , and thats satisfied. I think this, mr. Chairman, ought to be on the january calendar, and the way that miss pelham is scheduling these matters, its for discussion and or vote, correct. Yes. Again, its up to the commissioner direction as to what you would like to see. So i have a process direction to the city attorney. As this item is agendaized, is it and i think staff is asking for policy direction, so could we discuss im assuming the answer is yes, but i wanted to clarify. Could we discuss, as a body, whether or not as a policy matter we wanted to pursue this item now . We dont have to wait until the january meeting to discuss it . Well, i mean, it sounds like the questions are sort of how you want to proceed from a priority perspective, so you know, i think you could give advice about how how you wanted staff to, you know, to prioritize the different item. , and i think also, just some substantive discussion, as well. Thank you. So if we could, you know, on this item you
Resiliency, and i must say the land use had the greatest dialogue, and we came back together as a working group not long ago, a month or two ago, and it appeared that, from my perspective that the we needed to elevate the conversation across the three sub committees and try to bring it out of the silo and try to integrate all of the work that weve been doing, and so weve been very vocal as tryit tryin continue that conversation. Were in phase two or part two or whatever part two, and its going to go into part three which is a long Public Outreach and Engagement Process that will then evolve into what the document will ultimately get published as. Not only does it need to be aspirationial, but it needs to be holistic, and thats what weve been trying to interject into this whole process, and the waterfront and the port is a whole cultural legacy of our city, and the individual pieces of it that are identified as historic elements are just a piece, just smaller elements of that, and weve