The washington journal this morning. We send you over to live coverage of the d. C. Circuit court of appeals. [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2020] these adding unconstitutional burdens of process to punish michael flynn, judge sullivan discarded any semblance of an impartial adjudicator that he had been extolled. As the cornerstone of any system of justice worth the label. Four rulings are required to conclude this article. The judges position must be flatly denied with clear language the judge has no standing to seek relief in this because hee ruling has invested himself in his prosecution of general flynn, there is now a glaring appearance of bias to millions of citizens. Requires the vacation of and forth, they must compel the District Court to grant the dismissal as a matter of law. Only department of justice can decide the Pu
Release of certain grand jury materials, the United States house of representatives. Justice,department of the District Court, so this court could have an opportunity to review the import questions of the day. The court denied that motion, even though it is clear that once the issues are disclosed, they cannot be undisclosed. The court denied that motion on of merit, butse as we explained, the District Court committed at least two serious errors of law in granting the request. Start with irreparable harm. It is the case that if we agree with the District Court, the irreparable harm is not that important. Freeman our intention in the case like judge griffith it would likely what significance is it . Freeman basically, in terms of the irreparable piece, the disclosure of grand jury information from a massive investigation concluded eight 25ths ago, there are only hours coming out of that proceeding there are 2800. Judge directly to this material. Mr. Freeman how does that relate . Yes, t
Authorizing the release of certain grand jury materials in the case. For the u. S. Department of justice, mr. Letter. Judge rogers good morning. Good morning, your honor. The District Court, so this court could have an opportunity to review the import questions of the day. The court denied that motion, even though it is clear that once the issues are disclosed, they cannot be undisclosed. Nrungell cannot be ou afterthefact. The court denied that motion on the left because of merit, but as we explained, the District Court committed at least two serious errors of law in granting the request. Judge griffith you can start with irreparable harm. It is the case that if we agree with the District Court, the irreparable harm is not that important. Mr. Freeman i disagree with that. Our intention in the case judge griffith you thought you were likely to lose on merits . What significance is it . Mr. Freeman i agree with that. In terms of the irreparable harm , the disclosure of grand jury inform
Weve explained in our motion the District Court committed at least two serious errors of law in granting the request. Start with the it is the case, however, that we agreed with the District Court on the irreparable harm is not that important. Our contention in this case we thought that we would like to [inaudible] i agree with you that we have to show that dont agree we dont have that that the disclosure of grand jury information from a massive criminal investigation that concluded only eight months ago, there are only 25 pending criminal matters that come out of that proceedings. There are 2800 criminal grand jury subpoenas in connection directly to the material thats exactly the yes, and thats the point on our second argument that thats the committees burden to demonstrate that. Well, i suggest that the courts findings plus special counsel supports volume two, plus, what the said in the supplemental statements during oral arguments seems to specify why it thinks certain material is
Half. Committee on the Judiciary Committee, United States house of representatives versus department of justice. U. S. Department of justice, mr. Letter counsel. Good morning your honor. May it please the court. This is a court denies the request for state and appeal for the opportunity to review the important questions of the day. The court denied that motion even though it is clear that once the grand jury secret issues are already close they cannot be undisclosed. The court denied that motion because effectively it was right on the merits. But as we explained that in her motion the District Court committed at least two serious errors of law in granting the request. Start with irreparable harm. It is the case that if we agreed with the District Court on the two prongs, the affable harm irreparable harm is not that important. I disagree. First, our contention in this case you thought we were would likely do this on the merits . What significance is it . I agree with you. In terms of t