Since the last oral argument in this case the committee referred to the house of representatives, the house of representatives approved two articles of impeachment. Neither of those articles arise out of the events investigated by the special counsel nor the events described in the report of the special counsel land we are here today facing a different claim by the committee, for some political reasons pages 13 to 17 of the supplements a brief their argument is they need the grand jury information to prove in a senate trial on the articles of impeachment approved by the house, the president s culpability for those high crimes and misdemeanors. There are a couple problems with that. The first is that is not what the court found in this case. The court knows we have significant concerns, we dont think she applied to test at all but put that aside. What the District Court found was the house of representatives was acting preliminary to a Senate Impeachment trial on misconduct in the Muell
Authorizing the release of certain grand jury materials in the case. For the u. S. Department of justice, mr. Letter. Judge rogers good morning. Good morning, your honor. The District Court, so this court could have an opportunity to review the import questions of the day. The court denied that motion, even though it is clear that once the issues are disclosed, they cannot be undisclosed. Nrungell cannot be ou afterthefact. The court denied that motion on the left because of merit, but as we explained, the District Court committed at least two serious errors of law in granting the request. Judge griffith you can start with irreparable harm. It is the case that if we agree with the District Court, the irreparable harm is not that important. Mr. Freeman i disagree with that. Our intention in the case judge griffith you thought you were likely to lose on merits . What significance is it . Mr. Freeman i agree with that. In terms of the irreparable harm , the disclosure of grand jury inform
Weve explained in our motion the District Court committed at least two serious errors of law in granting the request. Start with the it is the case, however, that we agreed with the District Court on the irreparable harm is not that important. Our contention in this case we thought that we would like to [inaudible] i agree with you that we have to show that dont agree we dont have that that the disclosure of grand jury information from a massive criminal investigation that concluded only eight months ago, there are only 25 pending criminal matters that come out of that proceedings. There are 2800 criminal grand jury subpoenas in connection directly to the material thats exactly the yes, and thats the point on our second argument that thats the committees burden to demonstrate that. Well, i suggest that the courts findings plus special counsel supports volume two, plus, what the said in the supplemental statements during oral arguments seems to specify why it thinks certain material is
Half. Committee on the Judiciary Committee, United States house of representatives versus department of justice. U. S. Department of justice, mr. Letter counsel. Good morning your honor. May it please the court. This is a court denies the request for state and appeal for the opportunity to review the important questions of the day. The court denied that motion even though it is clear that once the grand jury secret issues are already close they cannot be undisclosed. The court denied that motion because effectively it was right on the merits. But as we explained that in her motion the District Court committed at least two serious errors of law in granting the request. Start with irreparable harm. It is the case that if we agreed with the District Court on the two prongs, the affable harm irreparable harm is not that important. I disagree. First, our contention in this case you thought we were would likely do this on the merits . What significance is it . I agree with you. In terms of t
Lamar County Commissioner’s Court approved a proposed 2023-24 salary schedule for elected officials Monday and awarded an incentive to a solar farm project for a Delaware-based company expected to locate