it absolutely tears away the appearance of impartiality and that s a very important process question. laura: sol, some in the media are claiming this case, even without the particulars in the indictment, would be what the founders would have wanted. watch. this is totally unprecedented in our history, but it is not out of character for our history. and i think it s really important to understand that what s happening today is very much in line with what the founders envisionedd. reporter: sean, when jonathan alter is citing the founders grab your constitution. your response? grab your articles of confederation. you re in real trouble when that happens. i don t know what on earth, what on earth he means by that. it s so ridiculous. it s even a matter of history.
and impossible to deal with during the witch hunt trial. hi trial.s daughter worked for . and now the biden harris campaign kangaroo court.ourt here s trump s lawyer, joe tacopina. talking about it.client my client ha hs a right to havet an issue with everything he s been politically persecuted. i have no reason to believe this. peason - been before him on this matter. so so we have to let thist th process play outis. you can expect several legal challenges from president trump s legal team, tacopina said . tonight on hannity that he doesn t even expect this case e to go to trial. but ift it does, the prosecutir wants that to happenosec in january , which is right at the beginning ofimary republican primary season. as for the next court hearing,a set for december 4th, when city, president trump will come lback here to new york city, thank you so m up on eight may. this is insanity. allthank you so much. all right. nate mentioned that no gag order. the judg makine warned trump ab
the trial. it s absolutely tears away the appearance of impartiality . vy import and that s a very importantan process. question saw some in qu the media are claiming that this case,mina even withoutse the particulars n the indictment, would be what the founders wouldld wanted. but this is totally unprecedented. unprecedented in our in our history, but it is nothir out of character for our history. and i think it si really important to understand that was happening today is ver happy much in line with what the founders envisioned saw whe when jonathan alter is citing the founders, grab your constitution. their response to grabs your articles of confederationn . we re in real troublthe when tht when that happens, i don t know what on earth, what on earth he means by that. it s it s so ridiculous. as is even the matter of
case is about. laura: well a blatantly false a blatantly false statement. here s the onl y thingin ifn lawyers need to know about this case.ft if after the twenterytion twenty election, donald trump had announced that he was retiring from politics,indict alvin would not have indicted him.ed or let s say if after 2020, trump had gradually evolved ind his views and maybe became more like romney or one of the bushes in that case,ve ind alvin bragg would not haveic indicted him. the real reason that donald trump was bookedngerprin and fingerprinted today comes down to one simple fact. wrong he has the wrongs political views. now to the entire class of politicians and media figures who cheered the proceedings today. donaldding trump represents an existential threat, a threat to the regim thee that s run our country into the ground fort decades, a threat to the credibilit tibility y the mediae calls out relentlessly. but most significant of all,um another trump term is a threata
to the biden family and their nonstop grift machine. alvin bragg is more like alvin bag because he s nothing but the bag man for the white house hoping his reward comes when he runs for, let s say, governor as the trump slayer. yet right now he s july the middleman for the dnc and an elicit scheme to interfere in the 2024 election cycle. and his a ston i shallingly thin indictment brag alleges it was trump who may have, now i say may have attempteded to interfere in the 2020 election or may have violated state election laws by allegedly ordering that former mistresses be paid off then concealing the reimbursement of thoseouts. in a few moments we re going to talk with a former chair of the federal election commission who explained why the fec decided against pursuing the case on similar grounds. but as we suspected last week, the question bragg left everyone