a felony statute, had some electricity and you get the frankenstein. i you know, i don tgree i agt with all the legal scholars that you ve had on fox. go this casge the fe is notir goint past the first couple of motions. and i bet it s ten to one . i d put money on it that it ll never get to a jury. i think the d.a. s on trialin here.that s and i think that, yo goiu know,g that s that s going to be- the real he s had his - 10 minutes of crime i m sorry. ten minutes of fame.s of fame a think he has to go out and now i think he s got to go out and be a real lawyer and he s going to have to face up to trump s twenty two hundred dollars an hour lawyers. and i thinhour lawyerk going to ripped to shreds. a i don t think he s a real attorney . now, thireal attorney. s is just another this is another embarrassment for the democrat legal legal complex. chris , great to see you.chgr thank you.ea now acting new york supremert court justice one murcheson is thejustic judge presiding ovr trump s
the founders, as you know, were quite partisan and, you know, the federalist went after the democrats with the alien sedition act and jefferson turned the tables on them. so it makes absolutely no sense. it s kind of akin to dana bash s spirit of the law statement. but david makes a really good point. it is not i don t know whether or not this judge is biassed or not. he seemed to go out of his way to show that he didn t want to issue a gag order. but i know that the appearance, the appearance of propriety is very, very important. and every judge should think about this when he or she decides whether they should stay on case. laura: well, david, one thing struck me as potentially concerning tonight, and everyone knows i always speak my mind on these legal issues. i thought trump s speech was really very strong in tone and speech and it was factual on what biden s done to the
his case today and inadvertently engaged in some standup comedy. these are felony crimes in new york state no matter who you are. we cannot and will not normalize serious criminal conduct. reporter: what? normalizing serious criminal conduct is all his office ever does. like the case from over the weekend where a parking garage attendant saw a man casing the cars in his garage. he confronted the suspect, who then pulled out a handgun and shot the parking attendant twice. the worker wrestled the gun away and shot the suspect in the chest. now, in the real world where i tend to live, the worker did the right thing. but in the bragg world, the parking attendant was charged with attempted murder along with the actual criminal. this is the insane. bragg finally backtracked and announced, only after public outcry, that he would not
being assigned to this case. you know, i know the banner says trump impeachment lawyer for me that was a great honor but i ve been a civil rights and criminal lawyer my whole career i represented the democratic lawyer last year and a socialist candidate for president in 2020. i am concerned about the integrity of the system and about process. there is a real problem now the judge was assigned to each of these cases, an historic practice in this office that was commented on by in a report in 2002 by new york city bar top lawyers in the city complained about this judge shopping practice. the case they lost a case challenging it but a federal judge said in the franken leo case in 2004 that the impartiality and appearance of impartiality of the system is directly at steak and at risk by this kind of judge shopping process. at that time the da s office promised they stopped it and the process was assigning, picking a judge to preside over the grand jury and then keeping that judge for the
the matter of the judge beingknw assigned to this case. you know, i the banner says m trump impeachment lawyer. for me, that was an honor,e thonor a great honor. utfor me. right bus t i ve been a civil rightseh and a criminal lawyer my whole career. i represente d the democratic lawyer l party last year. i represented a socialist candidate foasr president . i enty , twenty . i am concernedam about the integrity of the system. i m concerned about process.obe judge s a realm problem here that this judge was assigned to each of these cases.practiceo this is an historic practice in this office that wasff commentea on by a report 2002 by a new york city bar.ity complained top criminal lawyers in the city complained about this judgis judgetice.e shopping pra the case. they lost a case challenging it, buchallet a federal judge sn the frank and frank and leo case, in two thousand four that the impartiality and the appearance of impartialityof of the system is directly at stake and is at risk b