case is about. laura: well a blatantly false a blatantly false statement. here s the onl y thingin ifn lawyers need to know about this case.ft if after the twenterytion twenty election, donald trump had announced that he was retiring from politics,indict alvin would not have indicted him.ed or let s say if after 2020, trump had gradually evolved ind his views and maybe became more like romney or one of the bushes in that case,ve ind alvin bragg would not haveic indicted him. the real reason that donald trump was bookedngerprin and fingerprinted today comes down to one simple fact. wrong he has the wrongs political views. now to the entire class of politicians and media figures who cheered the proceedings today. donaldding trump represents an existential threat, a threat to the regim thee that s run our country into the ground fort decades, a threat to the credibilit tibility y the mediae calls out relentlessly. but most significant of all,um another trump term is a threata
records and another crime, but is not to say what those crimes were. we are assuming perhaps that they might be election related. i m wondering if you cang if let my what laws were broken. so let me let me say as an initial matter that the indictment doesn t specify that because the law does not speae saw the law does not require me to do that. is that an adequate responseison given the defendant herese? e re it isn t an adequate response. and , atere wiointed outsp a minimum,ll there will be a bil of particulars. so he will havto e to do thatprc before too long as a duees process matter. and i diand i did see i did wats whole press conference and i pai thought the whole press conference was pathetic. c. been saand i ve been saying a few days now, don t focus on the number of counts, focusea on whether or not there s anyg h real substance there. is this something that
and impossible to deal with during the witch hunt trial. hi trial.s daughter worked for . and now the biden harris campaign kangaroo court.ourt here s trump s lawyer, joe tacopina. talking about it.client my client ha hs a right to havet an issue with everything he s been politically persecuted. i have no reason to believe this. peason - been before him on this matter. so so we have to let thist th process play outis. you can expect several legal challenges from president trump s legal team, tacopina said . tonight on hannity that he doesn t even expect this case e to go to trial. but ift it does, the prosecutir wants that to happenosec in january , which is right at the beginning ofimary republican primary season. as for the next court hearing,a set for december 4th, when city, president trump will come lback here to new york city, thank you so m up on eight may. this is insanity. allthank you so much. all right. nate mentioned that no gag order. the judg makine warned trump ab
but the portly d.a. trieday and to sell this case today in an certainly engaged in some stand up comedy. these are felony crimes. whu new york state, no matter who you are, we cannot and will not normalize serious criminal conduct. what normaliz e seriousffice criminal conduct? is all his officev e ever does.n like the case for him over the weekend where a parking garage attendanta ma saw a manfe casing the cars in hisd garage, he confronted the suspect shot the who then pulled out a handgun and shot the parkingarking attet twice. d th the worker, moossa daria, wrestled the gun away and shott. the suspect in the chest. now,n a real world whereght i tend to live, the worker didt. the right thing. murde but in the brad world , the parking attendant was charged with attempted murder along with the actual criminal . this is insane. greg finally backtracked and announced only after public outcry that he would not
assistant us attorney and deputy independent counselww . david , i llh start with you.o i don t even know wherethis w to begin tonight. this whole thing is such a disgrace. ho ibut this indictment, as you read it all 16 pages,, represens represents what it s shocking. i cannot believe that thisttorn district attorney did thisformer to the country to indict a former president based on this kind of theory. i also read the 12 page statement of facts that accompanies the indictment,e and it only raises more questions. the indictment clearly is deficient from a due processr perspective. mr. briggs said , well, they ll producocese evidence at trial.sl this is all they have to do is track the language of the statute. the absolutely not true.. the fifth and sixth amendments require, as a matter of duet they process, right to counsel, etexl cetera, that they be toly d wha exactly they re charged with . the target crime here is absentd from every count o yf the indictment. and you read the state