asking today is, where s the beef? here s where we re going to run into legal problems, because the indictment does not say what that second crime is, which is completely inexplicable to me. the entire point of an indictment is to tell the defendant here s what you re charged with, as he said federal campaign election law but this is new york state so said state election law but this is a campaign for president which is federal and there was one word said something about tax but they didn t take detucks, real question about this. it s disappointment. it s hard to imagine convincing a jury that they should get there. one source said to me, this is donald trump. you don t bring a knife to a gun fight. i had hoped that there would be more in the indictment. reporter: translation, this case is a dead doing in the middle of the road. have someone come pick it up and give it a prompt burial. but the portly da tried to sell
statute, add some electricity and you get the frankenstein. you know, i don t i agree with all the legal scholars that you ve had on fox. this case is not going to get past the first couple of motions and i ll bet it s 10-1 i ll put money on it that it will never get to a jury. i think the da s on trial here and i think that s going to be the real he s had his ten minutes of crime i m sorry, ten minutes of fame and now i think he has to go out and be a real lawyer and he has to face up to trump s $2,200 an hour lawyers and i think they ll rip him to shreds i don t think he s a real attorney. laura: no, this is another embarrassment for the democrat legal complex. chris great to see you. thank you acting new york supreme court justice juan merchan is the judge presiding over trump s days so what do we know and will he try to muzzle the former president? all the details on that next. stay there.
and speech was it was factualy. on what biden s done to the country. buentionint in mentioning the or case, which is the documents case and going into some some detail about that casey and makingdanger comments aboutt case, is there any danger in litigating that separatethis investigation while talking about this investigation? or a hm i being overly sensitiv, here? no, look, you ve made a good. point, i think. but i think president trump feels under siege with these cases. he sees them cases. as they are simply an attack on his candidacy and and all part of one sort of bundle of attacks.so he and so is frustrated. and he s talking about as he feels appropriate, talkingr about these other so-calledsoin investigations. th and it s a shame because, you know, obviously a goal is to distract him from the real sp tk issues. ing and as i ve suggested hi, he must keep talking aboutm an the real issues. that s what people wanto fi to hear from himgh and his lawyers. if i e saw your reac
but the portly d.a. trieday and to sell this case today in an certainly engaged in some stand up comedy. these are felony crimes. whu new york state, no matter who you are, we cannot and will not normalize serious criminal conduct. what normaliz e seriousffice criminal conduct? is all his officev e ever does.n like the case for him over the weekend where a parking garage attendanta ma saw a manfe casing the cars in hisd garage, he confronted the suspect shot the who then pulled out a handgun and shot the parkingarking attet twice. d th the worker, moossa daria, wrestled the gun away and shott. the suspect in the chest. now,n a real world whereght i tend to live, the worker didt. the right thing. murde but in the brad world , the parking attendant was charged with attempted murder along with the actual criminal . this is insane. greg finally backtracked and announced only after public outcry that he would not
good point to raise with you, the democrats go with brass knuckles. you know, trump s a fighter, too, so he hits back at them hard which they re not used to. chris is exactly like they re used to the velvet glove treatment from the mitch mcconnell side of the aisle. but in this case you have a focus on getting this man and getting him again and getting him again. they re not going to stop. and we find out tonight that the wisconsin supreme court flipped and became controlled by the democrats, there was that one race they thought might go to the republicans. republicans lost that. so the republican party has enormous challenges even in the head winds that the democrats have created with this horrific economy. so you ve got to get more votes somewhere. you have to get the votes in order to have the power. democrats last election and the midterms had the votes. more votes that they thought they were going to get. there s two things laura that republicans have to do between now and then.