Make clear that new york citys restrictive premises license and accompanying transport ban are unconstitutional. The citys restriction on transporting firearms to places where they may be lawfully possessed and its insistence in its revised regulations that any transport be continuous and uninterrupted are premised on a view of the Second Amendment as a homebound right with any ability to venture beyond the area with a firearm. That view is inconsistent with text, history and tradition and this courts cases. The text of the Second Amendment protects rights to keep and bear arms. That latter right makes clear that the Second Amendment protects rights that are not strictly limit today the premise and theres no historical analog for the citys prohibition on transporting firearms to places where they may be lawfully used. To the contrary, the Second Congress required the militia to take their own firearms from their homes to the Training Ground and the regulations on limiting where firearm
State acity of new york. Text and tradition make clear that new york city restricted premises license and accompanying transport bannekers constitutional. To transport the continuous and uninterrupted premised on a view of the Second Amendment as homebound right. With any ability to venture beyond the curtilage with the firearm even locked and unloaded a matter of government grace. That view is and can student with text history tradition and this courts cases. The text of the Second Amendment to protect rights to keep and bear arms. That letter right makes clear that the Second Amendment protect rights that are not strictly limited to the premises. There is no historical analogue for the citys prohibition on transporting firearms to places where they may be lawfully used. To the contrary, the Second Congress required the militia to take their own firearms from their homes to the training ground. The regulations on limiting where firearms may be discharged or training may occur that the
What can we expect on a trial in the senate . Our experts weigh in and Amy Klobuchar joins us live. Plus, bloomberg launches hes taking on him. Im Mike Bloomberg and i approve this message. With the biggest ad buyin. Chris christie and donna brazil join our round table. Well break down the politics, smoke out the spin. The facts that matter this week. Announcer heres chief anchor george stephanopoulos. Good morning and welcome to this week. After two weeks, 12 witnesses more than 30 hours of testimony, the public hearings into the impeachment of President Trump appear to be over. What did we learn . The evidence established a series of facts. Did President Trump launch a campaign with ukraine into joe biden . And that trumps Key National Security players knew about it. Ambassador Gordon Sondland put it starkly. Everyone was in the loop. That included secretary pompeo, right . Many people. Secretary pompeo . Yes. Acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney . Yes. Shadow diplomacy outside normal
Campaign 2020. As always, we will take your calls and you can join the conversation on facebook and twitter as well. Washington journal is next. Is next. Host as Congress Returns from its thanksgiving break, House Committees get back to work on the impeachment inquiry. House Intelligence Committee releasing its report to members, voting on it on tuesday and the House Judiciary Committee holding its first public hearing on wednesday. Good morning and welcome to washington journal on monday, december 2, 2019. We would like to ask you what is your message to your member of congress on impeachment . Republicans, call 2027488001. Democrats, 2027488000. Independents and others, 2027488002. You can send us a text. Make sure you include your name and where you are texting from. 2027488003. On twitter, we are at cspanwj on facebook, you can post at facebook. Com cspan. We heard from the administration from the white house in particular. A letter from the president s council and we will show you
Ceo of the National Constitution center, joining us here on washington journal to talk about impeachment and the constitution, where things stand now. And he has a new book about Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Will get to that as well. Good morning. Thanks for being here. Guest great to be here. Host how does this 2019 impeachment inquiry, where the process is now, how does this align with what the constitution says the process should be . Guest the constitution does not say much about what the process should be. It has a couple of really important things. First, in article one, section two, it says that the house should have the sole power of impeachment. Then, in the part about the senate, it says the senate should have the sole power to try impeachments and that impeachment should be presided over by the chief justice. Impeachedresident is and conviction is by two thirds of the senate but should not extend further than removal from office and disqualification to hold future offices of honor o