Right with any ability to venture beat on the curtilage with a a firearm even locked ad unloaded, a matter of government grace period that he is inconsistent with text, history, tradition and this court cases. The text of the Second Amendment protects rights to keep and bear arms. That latter right makes clear that the Second Amendment protects rights that are not strictly limited to the premises. There is no historical analog for the cities prohibition on transporting firearms to places where the may be lawfully use. To the contrary, the Second Congress required the militia to take their own firearms from their homes to the training ground. The regulations on limiting where firearms may be discharged or were training may occur that the city invokes both underscore that the general rule was that firearms could be safely transported between and among places way they could be used and discharge. This court recognized as much in heller, both by recognizing the long history of handgun poss
Make clear that new york citys restrictive premises license and accompanying transport ban are unconstitutional. The citys restriction on transporting firearms to places where they may be lawfully possessed and its insistence in its revised regulations that any transport be continuous and uninterrupted are premised on a view of the Second Amendment as a homebound right with any ability to venture beyond the area with a firearm. That view is inconsistent with text, history and tradition and this courts cases. The text of the Second Amendment protects rights to keep and bear arms. That latter right makes clear that the Second Amendment protects rights that are not strictly limit today the premise and theres no historical analog for the citys prohibition on transporting firearms to places where they may be lawfully used. To the contrary, the Second Congress required the militia to take their own firearms from their homes to the Training Ground and the regulations on limiting where firearm
State acity of new york. Text and tradition make clear that new york city restricted premises license and accompanying transport bannekers constitutional. To transport the continuous and uninterrupted premised on a view of the Second Amendment as homebound right. With any ability to venture beyond the curtilage with the firearm even locked and unloaded a matter of government grace. That view is and can student with text history tradition and this courts cases. The text of the Second Amendment to protect rights to keep and bear arms. That letter right makes clear that the Second Amendment protect rights that are not strictly limited to the premises. There is no historical analogue for the citys prohibition on transporting firearms to places where they may be lawfully used. To the contrary, the Second Congress required the militia to take their own firearms from their homes to the training ground. The regulations on limiting where firearms may be discharged or training may occur that the
Anything they can, especially when it comes to womens rights were fighting for them every single day. But he kept saying, i want to stay in my lane. How is a man . Telling a woman what to do with her right to choose staying in his lane. Im and yes. You has that he can say that, but i think the nfl missed an opportunity here to bring more women to their side and say, hey, look, we had a great year with all these women who loved actually be here and play and being a part of this game, if you missed up, they missed him an opportunity to stand up for women is what i what is interesting here is the nfl response. You talked about just saying look, these are not our views, these are his views only, but also during his speech, we heard that him use a taylor swift line. This is taylor swifts one of the most feminist, feminist people who is not married, doesnt have kids and has a huge career. Do you think shes going to Say Something i be sure. Write a song about it. The swifties have already spo
Maybe they. Maybe they were cheering, cheering me. It was an achievement that won him the nobel prize. Professor peter higgs at university of edinburgh. On behalf of a modest man, he avoided the fuss by going to a nearby restaurant when the award was announced. The former neighbour congratulated me on the news and i said, oh, what news . And so she told me that her daughter had phoned from london to alert her to the fact that i had got this prize. As a young theoretical physicist, he was fascinated by the behaviour of the Subatomic Particles that lay at the heart of atoms. He went on to develop a theory of how these particles gain substance oi mass. Summed up in this equation, Professor Higgs predicted a field which permeates the entire universe. Five other scientists also came up with similar ideas at around the same time. But in this historic paper from 1964, peter higgs was the only one to have predicted the existence of the particle through which it operated. The only thing i, i th