Venture beyondto the curtilage with the firearm even locked and unloaded a matter of government grace. That view is and can student with text history tradition and this courts cases. The text of the Second Amendment to protect rights to keep and bear arms. That latter right makes clear that the Second Amendment protect rights that are not strictly limited to the premises. There is no historical analogue for the citys prohibition on transporting firearms to places where they may be lawfully used. To the contrary, the Second Congress required the militia to take their own firearms from their homes to the training ground. The regulations on limiting where firearms may be discharged or training may occur that the city invokes both underscore that the general rule was that firearms can be safely transported between and among places where they could be used and discharged. The court recognizes this much in heller both by recognizing the long history of handgun possession outside the home and
State acity of new york. Text and tradition make clear that new york city restricted premises license and accompanying transport bannekers constitutional. To transport the continuous and uninterrupted premised on a view of the Second Amendment as homebound right. With any ability to venture beyond the curtilage with the firearm even locked and unloaded a matter of government grace. That view is and can student with text history tradition and this courts cases. The text of the Second Amendment to protect rights to keep and bear arms. That letter right makes clear that the Second Amendment protect rights that are not strictly limited to the premises. There is no historical analogue for the citys prohibition on transporting firearms to places where they may be lawfully used. To the contrary, the Second Congress required the militia to take their own firearms from their homes to the training ground. The regulations on limiting where firearms may be discharged or training may occur that the
Im again, go under hash. Think people are allowed to speak about me and i havent again, going with the judge, the judge as a conflict with the worst ive ever seen and it has to end with the judge the gag order has to come off. I shouldnt be allowed to speak every time i come out to speak to you, i want to be open because we did they nothing wrong. I showed you yesterday 30 stores, 32 stories of experts, legal experts, and i dont know how one the other way. Very juicers but legal experts say very strongly is no case dislocation. Who brought trump did nothing wrong. And they say its showing trump did nothing wrong they already get rid of the conflict with the judge because thats something that he cannot do anything about. Its wrong. Its wrong. And the second thing is after we released them again or theyve taken away my Constitutional Rights to speak and added to it speaking to you. I have a lot to say. They can continue to make up lies and Everything Else they live there but im not allow
If my memory serves me correctly, once the new Relief Agency started, foye which i believe there was definitely a need, the voluntary giving to the red cross plum netted. Hoover was worried about the longterm implications of turning away from volunteer, selfhelp, community organizations, helping your neighbors and being your brothers keeper. He was worried if it all just became subsumed or replaced by deps upon a bureaucratic regime. Those are some of the ways that it affected his response to the flood and later the depression. Im not a historian. I was born in 1948, the middle of the 20th century. Some of us think, and i didnt think much about world war i. Could this period of time be another 100 year period where we will go through more turmoil and 100 years from now, theyll be looking back at this time period in not exactly the same way but in a somewhat similar way as we are looking back at 20s and 1916. Maybe in 2116 people will see things more clearly where we cant see it now, be
Anniversary of the attack with a ceremony at pearl harbor. Admiral harry harris, head of the u. S. Pacific command, delivers the keynote address. Just under 90 minutes. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen and welcome to todays joint National Parks Service United states Navy Pearl Harbor rem brans day ceremony. I am robert franklin, deputy chief of staff for the Commander Naval Surface Group and im truly honored to serve as todays master of ceremonies on this historic 75th anniversary. This years theme is honoring the past, inspiring the future. Today we will pay tribute to those members of the greatest generation who paved the way here in pearl harbor for current and future generations throughout the world. Will the guests please rise, as able, for arrival of the official party. The official party for todays ceremony includes miss jacqueline ashwell, superintendent world war ii valor in the Pacific National Monument National park service. Miss laura joss, regional director, pacific west