[crowd murmuring] - a crucial supreme court ruling on affirmative action could come tomorrow, as colleges and universities grapple with the possibility that race might no longer be a factor in admissions. - the central question being decided this time: is should affirmative action continue forever in the name of diversity, and are the gains achieved worth the harms allegedly inflicted on asian american students? this is the most important civil rights case of our era. i don t think it s an overstatement to say they re freaking out right now. one admissions official told me, some colleges are so worried about being sued in the wake of this decision that they re thinking about scrubbing racial and ethnic data from their websites. there has to be some discrimination here. there has to be something against asian americans specifically. this case is going to be something more than just about admissions. the notion that noticing race is per se unconstitutional could be devastating
didn t seem to have an enemy in the world. right up until, the night he was murdered. there was evidence of a violent struggle between jack and his killer. someone was keeping secrets and police thought they knew who. her was just scary. they thought they knew the motive to. but a matter of proving it was a different story. until someone found the perfect bag. hey, dude it s me. you need to call me asap. could they set the perfect trap? these people might literally get away with murder. hello, and welcome to dateline. jack jessee, who was a doting granddad and the patriarch of a large blended and by all appearances, loving family. but when he was stabbed to death in the southern california home, police wondered if the jessee weren t quite as happy as the scene. the case went unsolved for years. but those who love jack never gave up hope. neither did the relentless detective who was determined to catch jack s killer. here s keith morrison with dea
The latter. Overcome them. We will seek to do the latter. The test for all of us. Well have reaction to the queens speech, and the latest on theresa mays attempt to strike a deal with the democratic unionists to support her government. Also tonight a funeral for the first victim named in the Grenfell Tower disaster a syrian refugee whod been studying engineering. The Duke Of Edinburgh enjoying royal Ascot Yesterday is in hospital tonight recovering from an infection. And its been the hottestjune day since the summer of 1976, but there are storms on the way. Good evening. The queens speech, listing the governments plans for the new parliament, is dominated by the brexit process. The speech is also notable for the absence of some major policies which featured in the conservative manifesto. Lets start with whats in the programme. There are 27 bills in total eight of those are linked to brexit. Theres a bill to tackle Domestic Violence in england and wales. And a bill to approve the second
statement? in fact the author of the statement? in fact the author of the statement didn t generally do the weekly balance. ihe statement didn t generally do the weekly balance. weekly balance. he can t recall makint weekly balance. he can t recall making good weekly balance. he can t recall making good any weekly balance. he can t recall making good any shortages - weekly balance. he can t recall i making good any shortages above relatively small ones. and that he hasn t requested any part of the physical kit to be replaced. there was no subsequent evidence to this for example, an investigation, somebody looking at the data. during this particular time to see if it was accurate or not. we during this particular time to see if it was accurate or not.- if it was accurate or not. we had no reason to disbelieve if it was accurate or not. we had no reason to disbelieve that if it was accurate or not. we had no reason to disbelieve that mr - if it was accurate or not. we had no rea
have mentioned it earlier. can we i have mentioned it earlier. can we look at 001 have mentioned it earlier. can we look at 001 2073, have mentioned it earlier. can we look at 001 2073, please? i this is the case of kim wiley. this is not a case study we are going to be looking at. but this is a document of february 2013. that is three years after you received those articles from computer weekly, etc. it has a letter from cartwright king to miss wylie s solicitors. it says, please find enclosed a notice of additional evidence, which includes two statements from stephen bradshaw, dated 20th of november, 2012, a 19th of february, 2013, as well as an exhibit, which is an extract from the supposed masters contract. at the bottom of the page,