it says, the crown s position on the integrity of the horizon system is set out in steep gradual s statement dated 20th of november, 2012. there is no further disclosure in relation to this matter. you havejust said that you re not very technically minded. do you think that the submission of a witness statement from you purporting to go to the integrity of the horizon system, do you think that was appropriate? know, because it depends on which statement know, because it depends on which statement it is. there was a statement it is. there was a statement put through explaining the basics statement put through explaining the basics of statement put through explaining the basics of horizon, that it was a keyboard. basics of horizon, that it was a keyboard, a scanner, a printer, the basic keyboard, a scanner, a printer, the basic workings of horizon is that you scan basic workings of horizon is that you scan. you have a document with a bar you scan. you have a document with a ba
have mentioned it earlier. can we i have mentioned it earlier. can we look at 001 have mentioned it earlier. can we look at 001 2073, have mentioned it earlier. can we look at 001 2073, please? i this is the case of kim wiley. this is not a case study we are going to be looking at. but this is a document of february 2013. that is three years after you received those articles from computer weekly, etc. it has a letter from cartwright king to miss wylie s solicitors. it says, please find enclosed a notice of additional evidence, which includes two statements from stephen bradshaw, dated 20th of november, 2012, a 19th of february, 2013, as well as an exhibit, which is an extract from the supposed masters contract. at the bottom of the page,