lawlessness about to ensue. and that is president joe bidee . he is enabling the cartels,ch emboldening the child traffickers and incentivizing human devastation. inwhen i worked in washingtonr as press secretary, my boss, . n former president trump, had a clear plan to secure our border inor, remain in mexi, for example, that requiredn migrants to stay in mexico during immigration hearings instead of being released into the interior and the safe third country agreement allowedt of te president trump to fly asylum applicants out of out bordersafe thir to a safe third party country. t president biden, he did entir away with trump s policies. he dismantled the entire and system. and now we are on the cuspp of biden doing another trump era policy, just tossing it out the window title . forty two . it s a pandemis c erfoa order ti allows for the rapid expulsion of migrants. the numbers tell the storynumbee of biden s border failure. nearly six million migrantssn t have crossed ou
conference in which we were trying to dealwith. i had conference in which we were trying to deal with. i had to level with the public to deal with. i had to level with the public and say, i am afraid a large the public and say, i am afraid a large number of people will lose their large number of people will lose their loved ones before their time and it their loved ones before their time and it was their loved ones before their time and it was a pretty grim press conference. and in that discussion, we were conference. and in that discussion, we were asked about the way through. and i think. we were asked about the way through. and i think, patrick said the idea was to and i think, patrick said the idea was to flatten the curve, suppress the virus was to flatten the curve, suppress the virus with some measure of herd immunity the virus with some measure of herd immunity by the virus with some measure of herd immunity by september, would be a -ood immunity by sep
service unease about the challenging approach of some of the special advisers approach of some of the special advisers and i had to make a judgment about the particular issue. and i decided, on balance, that at a very difficult time for the country i very difficult time for the country iwouid very difficult time for the country i would rather have a number ten where i would rather have a number ten where people challenged ideas and where where people challenged ideas and where people challenged ideas and where people brought new ideas and where where people brought new ideas and where people brought new ideas and where people felt free to say things other where people felt free to say things other tharr where people felt free to say things other than an where people felt free to say things otherthan an numberten where people felt free to say things other than an number ten where everybody other than an number ten where everybody tried to pretend that all was cont
seems irrational, but before you remove it, you need to understand why it might have been put there and that applies in other government departments. don t immediately rush to change things before understanding why they were there. as you say, while i was chancellor of the duchy of lancaster i became increasingly aware of the need for change and then as minister for the cabinet office i sought quickly to familiarise myself with those aspects of the operation of cabinet office that i had not been directly responsible for beforehand and became even more seized of the need for change in how it went. you became even more seized of the need for change in how it went. for change in how it went. you are not suggesting for change in how it went. you are not suggesting that for change in how it went. you are not suggesting that this not suggesting that this functionality if revealed in the heart of a government department is something that should not be addressed? something th