communication if you like but not enough was done. the other issue i think we will hear an awful lot about was obviously last week was a science week, we heard from some of the top scientists and again the general theme there seemed to be the scientists frustration with this government mantra of following the science which they said basically meant that scientists were used as scapegoats for controversial decisions that politicians were making. and then of course the general thing which has been bubbling along over the last few weeks has been the chaos and confusion right at the centre of government in downing street. a lot of that is to do with the personalities involved, and so i think we will be hearing more on all of that because michael gove really had a front row seat to all of it. and another big name that we are expecting to hear from this week, matt hancock, the former health secretary, of course, who has come in for a huge amount of criticism from those at the very
seems irrational, but before you remove it, you need to understand why it might have been put there and that applies in other government departments. don t immediately rush to change things before understanding why they were there. as you say, while i was chancellor of the duchy of lancaster i became increasingly aware of the need for change and then as minister for the cabinet office i sought quickly to familiarise myself with those aspects of the operation of cabinet office that i had not been directly responsible for beforehand and became even more seized of the need for change in how it went. you became even more seized of the need for change in how it went. for change in how it went. you are not suggesting for change in how it went. you are not suggesting that for change in how it went. you are not suggesting that this not suggesting that this functionality if revealed in the heart of a government department is something that should not be addressed? something th