prime minister. there are rules and boundaries set to those roles by the code and their employment. but they are very much code and their employment. but they are very much not code and their employment. but they are very much not civil code and their employment. but they are very much not civil servants, - are very much not civil servants, therefore they are answerable only to the minister who appoints them, governed by or constrained by their special advisers code to which they are subject? special advisers code to which they are subject? are sub ect? correct. formally, the prime are subject? correct. formally, the prime minister are subject? correct. formally, the prime minister appoints are subject? correct. formally, the prime minister appoints all - are subject? correct. formally, the prime minister appoints all special| prime minister appoints all special advisers, even those who are attached to ministers and often move with them. so their personal affiliatio
public confidence, what can be done about travel restrictions and proportionality, the seriousness of the crisis by the 4th of february doesn t appear to be reflected in that debate. i doesn t appear to be reflected in that debate- that debate. i think it is a seriousness that debate. i think it is a seriousness of that debate. i think it is a seriousness of a - that debate. i think it is a seriousness of a crisis - that debate. i think it is a | seriousness of a crisis that that debate. i think it is a i seriousness of a crisis that it became but it wasn t apparent at that time. there had been a cabinet meeting on the 31st of january in which, if i remember correctly, the chief medical officer as well as a health secretary and the health secretary, and at that time the advice was the probability of the worst case, reasonable worst case was about io%. and so what you see here is a good summary of a brief discussion. the purpose of the meeting was a bilateral about the ma
well, stephen mentioned a few of it, right?presiden there s a number of policiest that that reside not only with the president, but with the secretary of dhs.e 20, soprocedure that w the the t we established in 2018p and nineteen twenty , we didn ts have any help from congress. and so this ideais - that only congress can solve thishere issue is a i have to call itt th what it is . it s a lie.et arn dothere are things that the secretary can do todays cris to solve this crisis is just takes leadership and it takesng will to do that. and he s not doing it,a lo unfortunately. and we heard a lot about this. eleven fifty nine p.m. time. you know, that s when it expires. but should we expect to see a mass rush of those thirty five to forty thousand individuals, as you said , are in ciudad juarez, or will it be a trickle? is this going to tak e a few days? a i think it s going to be a rush, but it s also goingg ovh to be a trickle. it s going be a little bit of both. you re going to see peop