Members participating remotely must continue to use Software Platforms while attending the proceedings unless they experience connectivity issues or other technical problems that render the member unable to participate on camera. If a member who is participating remotely experiences technical difficulties please contact the Committee Staff for assistance and theyll help you get reconnected. When recognized video of remontanaly attending members, participation will be via the Television Internet feeds. They are asking to mute their microphone when not speaking. Doing so will ensure that rowe moat Technology Works properly. Members will be recognized normally for asking questions but if they want to speak at another time they must seek that by unmuting phones. There is a slight lag of a few seconds between the time you start speaking and the camera shot switching to you. To account for this please do a quote, preamable, whatever that means, unquote, before you get to your actual question
Military affairs in United States military history. Hes also a fellow Department History alum from west point. And you know among others some comrades here. So joining him on this panel are two heavy hitters as well. Dr. John morrow you saw yesterday the Museum President ial counselor the franklin professor and chair of the History Department the university of georgia. Go dogs. Hes back and and joining him is associate professor of history at the university of new mexico, dr. Robert jefferson. To really lead us through this important topic. So on that adrian continued mission, right . Thank you. Appreciate that. Synonym to be its him. We are great. Thanks. Its an honor to be here. This is my third visit to the museum and every time i come its its grown. Its its mission has expanded. Its an exciting place and i i appreciate seeing that my father served in World War Two huey went ashore at normandy on the 14th day of the of the invasion and they served there for the rest of the war. My m
Military affairs in United States military history. Hes also a fellow Department History alum from west point. And you know among others some comrades here. So joining him on this panel are two heavy hitters as well. Dr. John morrow you saw yesterday the Museum President ial counselor the franklin professor and chair of the History Department the university of georgia. Go dogs. Hes back and and joining him is associate professor of history at the university of new mexico, dr. Robert jefferson. To really lead us through this important topic. So on that adrian continued mission, right . Thank you. Appreciate that. Synonym to be its him. We are great. Thanks. Its an honor to be here. This is my third visit to the museum and every time i come its its grown. Its its mission has expanded. Its an exciting place and i i appreciate seeing that my father served in World War Two huey went ashore at normandy on the 14th day of the of the invasion and they served there for the rest of the war. My m
Cracks joining us now is bryan mcgrath, a former Commanding Office of the uss bulkeley destroyer, and he is here to talk about the recent incident involving the colliding of u. S. Navy ships and the overall readiness of the navy. Thank you. We have seen four incidents in the pacific in the last that were two collisions off the coast of japan and off the coast of singapore. Collisions off the coast of japan and off the coast of singapore. Do you think this is a problem with leadership . What do you think is at the heart of these repeated incidents . Guest umm, i have not reached any conclusions, what i have done is formulate a lot of hype pot this ease and in the work i advocate, i have said for several years that the navy was too small to what is being asked of it and because it is too small, it is stretched thinly. Because it is stretched thinly, decisions are made to allocate ships against realworld Operational Missions that sometimes get in the way of the necessary training and read
Foreignpolicy. The uc a development of a trump doctrine so hard . Caller i think it is difficult to make without. Pristinee of the most lines for me about afghanistan was when he talked about going against his instinct, not to get involved. Because of the threat of terrorism, he was going to go ahead anywhere. He rarely talks about changing his mind. The instinct is not to involve in any longterm commitment. He would call it nationbuilding. I think that is a strawman. I think whether its in syria, he wanted to stay up. He was launching cruise missiles. Trump said he leans one way and then goes the other. Ont the trump doctrine foreignpolicy after his afghanistan speech during it follows the similar pattern the again in europe and north korea. Putting pressure on allies is the key to success overseas despite complications. We talked about that change in strategy. What, if anything, did we learn from this afghanistan speech about how the president might operate Going Forward . Seen as aa