for this in covid, it was the wrong crisis for this prime minister s skill set, which for this prime minister s skill set, which is for this prime minister s skill set, which is different, i think, from not potentially being up to the job of being not potentially being up to the job of being prime minister. what not potentially being up to the 0b of being prime minister. what you mean as the of being prime minister. what you mean as the wrong of being prime minister. what you mean as the wrong crisis - of being prime minister. what you mean as the wrong crisis for - of being prime minister. what you mean as the wrong crisis for this | mean as the wrong crisis for this prime minister s skill set? remake make you straightforward english, please? i make you straightforward english, lease? ~ , make you straightforward english, lease? ,, , , ., please? i think is somebody who would often please? i think is somebody who would often delay please? i think is somebody
of what lee kane said earlier, through the problem. 13:1 in light of what lee kane said earlier, can you make plain that it doesn t appearas you make plain that it doesn t appear as if any decision was made during the course of the weekend for a long time, there was a change in the strategic approach of the government, there was a realisation that they had to be a change of approach and much more stringent measures were likely to be required, but no actual decision was made to impose a lockdown? but no actual decision was made to impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe it impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe it was impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe it was we impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe it was we had - impose a lockdown? correct. the way i would describe it was we had a - i would describe it was we had a conversation with the pm on the saturday
thatis build up that social mixing. now, that is fine if you are intent on never having to do suppression measures again. but, from all of the evidence we have received from all of the advice that we have received, it was incredibly clear we were certainly going to have to do suppression measures again. we knew that all the way through. that was from the start. so, to then move forward and say, were going to get back into work when business wasn t even asking for people to come back into work, they were encouraging employees to stay at home, still. we developed all of these tools for remote working. but it was governments on its own demanding people go to work when the research we had were saying people were still quite cautious, businesses do not want to do it. the scientific opinion was that we would have to have another lockdown. to me it made absolutely no sense whatsoever why we were talking about getting everyone back to work and that were the stories that ended up bein