Indictment so lame and overtly political that its guarantied to galvanize every trump voter like funnel cake at a stock car race. Theres less meet on this indictment than a you are i can carcass in joy behars trash can. Stelter has a better chance of winning a wet tshirt contest. Dont Bother Reading it i can summit up for you. Donald trump disagreed with the election outcome. Oh, you thought there would be more . Sorry, these are democrats, they dont have to work hard when the media gives them cover and yes there is a second part, to forget about the hunter and joe show. Make news to conceal the real news. Yes, the doj and jack smith apparently believe that trumps Thought Crimes are more insidious than the International Racketeering gang known as the biden clan. Instead they chase Thought Crimes and if Thought Crimes were fromable we would all be screwed. Kat would be on death row complaining about wearing orange. But, see, we dont do Thought Crimes in this country. This isnt canada. T
Indictment so lame and overtly political that its guarantied to galvanize every trump voter like funnel cake at a stock car race. Theres less meet on this indictment than a you are i can carcass in joy behars trash can. Stelter has a better chance of winning a wet tshirt contest. Dont Bother Reading it i can summit up for you. Donald trump disagreed with the election outcome. Oh, you thought there would be more . Sorry, these are democrats, they dont have to work hard when the media gives them cover and yes there is a second part, to forget about the hunter and joe show. Make news to conceal the real news. Yes, the doj and jack smith apparently believe that trumps Thought Crimes are more insidious than the International Racketeering gang known as the biden clan. Instead they chase Thought Crimes and if Thought Crimes were fromable we would all be screwed. Kat would be on death row complaining about wearing orange. But, see, we dont do Thought Crimes in this country. This isnt canada. T
How else Couldhow Elseou Explai indictment so lame and overtly i political that its guaranteed to galvanize every trump voter like funnel cake at a stoc k race . Theres less meat on this indictment than a turkey carcases lesshis s. Enjoy backyards, trash can. Stelter hastelter s a better cht winning a wet tshirt contest. Dont bothershir reading it. I can sum it up for you. Donald trump disagreed with the electiondonald t outcome. E wo oh, you thought thered be more . Sorry, these are democrats. They dont have to work hard. When the media gives themto cover. And yes, theres this second part to forget about the huntere joe show. Make news to conceal the real news. Yes, the doj, jack smith apparently believed that trumps thought crimescrimes are insidious than the International Racketeering gang knownracketee gan as the bo instead, they chase thought crimes. And if thought crimes were b prosecutable, wed all be screwed. That would be a Death Rowaring complaining about wearing orange. But
Here. but deep down i keep i m disappointed because i keep thinking we could have avoided a lot of this chaos if president trump could have reigned himself and been more disciplined but i don t disagree with your point that s why people voted for him. greg: i disagree no matter what you do they re going to come after you. wasn t january 6th, they impeached him before that for a phone call. kat what s your take, i know you re a legal scholar kat: well, yeah, everybody thinks they re a legal scholar now so i might as well hop on. greg: well you watched a lot of la law growing up kat: i don t know what that is. [laughter] kat: i kept reading it and i was pretty confused because i guess they have to prove that he knew he lost the election and was saying all this stuff anyway. i don t think that he thinks he lost, first of all. greg: yeah kat: i know that he would
Here. but deep down i keep i m disappointed because i keep thinking we could have avoided a lot of this chaos if president trump could have reigned himself and been more disciplined but i don t disagree with your point that s why people voted for him. greg: i disagree no matter what you do they re going to come after you. wasn t january 6th, they impeached him before that for a phone call. kat what s your take, i know you re a legal scholar kat: well, yeah, everybody thinks they re a legal scholar now so i might as well hop on. greg: well you watched a lot of la law growing up kat: i don t know what that is. [laughter] kat: i kept reading it and i was pretty confused because i guess they have to prove that he knew he lost the election and was saying all this stuff anyway. i don t think that he thinks he lost, first of all. greg: yeah kat: i know that he would never say that he lost because