i am going to he show you some examples right now. but there are also details about the despite the fact he has less juice in all of america, he still has a grip over republican primaries. york times detailing how he silts around mar-a-lago and has a kind of obsession of political wannabes. they are also hangers-on and has-beens, like convicted felon roger stone, who. showing video, trichl is what at appears to be mar-a-lago who then trashes ron desantis. roger. roger ask that s how that relationship works. trump says oh, i didn t see you
we hope they are. another plea deal would be in the works as a result of the investigation into russian meddling in the presidential election. this involved this man. a conservative writer and associate of long-time trump ally, roger stone and in plea enegotiations and expected to be indicted for lying. hoowas a link between roger stone and wickey eleaks and if he etipped off the trichl campaign that wikileaks was planning to release stolen emails. sto stone. i have no idea what this is about other thantosay tosay that he knewen advanced that john podesta s emails were going
let me stipulate. i m against roy moore. i would not have voted for the guy even before all these allegations surfaced and i think the allegations credible but i think it s shrewd on a political level for the president to push the spotlight back onto doug jones and say no one is talking about how he would vote in the senate. that s how trichl is trying to bring wavering red state voters onto the side of someone they may find morally repellant, that s what the white house is trying to angle towards, i made this point earlier on america s newsroom politically this is about the best they can do. melissa: jessica, can they succeed in making it about politics instead of about ethics? i think they can because they did that in 2016 as well, the access hollywood tape came out, people said i have a daughter, i have a wife, it
say the sense of pay trichl, the only people disagreeing and being upset by it are experts, or highly educated folks who understand what civil liberties mean. yeah. go ahead, jeffrey. i m not sure. i actually think i give sort of the american people a little more credit than that. i think people understand that the government shouldn t be deciding what sort of speech is permissive and what s not. i don t think that s necessarily an elite point of view. i do agree that flag burning does bring out the anti-free speech spirit in at lot of people. but i think this is a sufficiently core value that it s not a matter of income or education or age. i think most people get it. i think most people, however, if you put a poll out, most people would say the first amendment should be amended to
terror partners if you will. and i m wondering if you fear that some of that money could be spent haunching terror strikes here in the united states. i think all i can say about that is iran s sponsorship of terrorism remains a focus of the entire intelligence community, including the fbi. we re responsible here in the united states. and i don t expect that threat to change to diminish in the wake of the additional money being available. you agree with him, that iran s going to have potentially a lot more money to spend in these kinds of state sponsor of trichl ways? absolutely they ll have greater resources. it mate not be in excess of $100 billion, the real number may be closer to $56 billion when you consider funds that are already obligated. nonetheless a big inclusionfusion of money. some of that they re going to have to put into their economy, that s what rouhani s been making the case for.