following that attack over the weekend in which 99%, the vast majority were shot down by a combination, not just of israeli defenses, but the us participated, france, the uk, as well as error partners. what would this tell you if israel was able to strike this deep even in a limited fashion inside iranian territory just suggest to me that the iranians do not have the state of state of the art missile defense, air defense systems that israel has. a lot of ways pioneered with our assistance so if the iranians are defending with limited battery use of s3, hundreds from russia those appear not to have been effective with respect to this, a drone attack assuming we just don t know enough, we don t know the number of a legend drones that perhaps were sent over by israel once that information becomes clear, then
unconditional withdrawal. we had to withdrawal by a time certain and a date certain. and these are yes or no questions, please, general milley. at the military s task to defeat terror threats from afghanistan out and harder? yes. does the taliban and its other terror partners have more ability to train and prepare in afghanistan now that we have left? more ability, yes. has president biden or is policy staff provided any updated guidance or direction for countering terror from afghanistan? yes. are we at a greater or lesser risk of terror attacks from afghanistan as a result of our withdrawal? it s too early to tell. i think we got about, to elaborate, i think we ve probably got about six months to
0 about 100 americans and that figure doesn t change. we need a real accounting for how many people, big difference between 100 and 4000. my biggest takeaway, we have no counter terrorism strategy and milley and mckenzie testifyod this, mckenzie said he is not confident we can prevent al qaeda or isis. harris: i am rushing, it is top of the hour, kayleigh and emily, everybody on outnumbered, quick one for us as we ark wait the panel to reconvene. thanks for watching fox news. our coverage continues on america reports. sandra: the senate armed services adjourning for a break, set to resume 30 minutes from now. the nation s top military leaders facing tough questioning on capitol hill for the first time since the chaotic exit from afghanistan. hello and welcome, everyone, i m sandra smith in new york. john: i m john robert necessary washington. lloyd austin, and general mark milley and general frank mckenzie all testifying today before the senate armed everybodies iss committee
terror partners if you will. and i m wondering if you fear that some of that money could be spent haunching terror strikes here in the united states. i think all i can say about that is iran s sponsorship of terrorism remains a focus of the entire intelligence community, including the fbi. we re responsible here in the united states. and i don t expect that threat to change to diminish in the wake of the additional money being available. you agree with him, that iran s going to have potentially a lot more money to spend in these kinds of state sponsor of trichl ways? absolutely they ll have greater resources. it mate not be in excess of $100 billion, the real number may be closer to $56 billion when you consider funds that are already obligated. nonetheless a big inclusionfusion of money. some of that they re going to have to put into their economy, that s what rouhani s been making the case for.