In space. Now here is a Panel Discussion on the American Space program. [inaudible conversations] good afternoon everybody. Are you all ready to blast off . Had to do at least one before we started. Welcome, everybody to the texas book festival and to all of you joining us on cspan book tv listening throughout the universe or even the known or unknown its good to have you here. It is my pleasure today to itod is my pleasure to introduce two authors and two books that i thoroughly enjoyed reading. I couldnt put either one of them down x. The other perhaps unique aspects is they were extremely well written. Ch im sure youll very much enjoy reading them. The first book is called leavingll orbit. It is by Margaret Lazarus dean, to my left, who is a professor of english at the university of tennessee knoxville. And then also steven moss has written this really [laughter] steven moss has written this very, very interesting book aso well called we could not fail. Steven iswe a professor in th
On the dialogue and key issues of our day from an ethical perspective. Information on Upcoming Events can be found online at westminster forum. Org. You may follow us on twitter at westminster thf. My name is tim hartanderson, im the senior administrator at the church located in beautiful Downtown Minneapolis and moderator of the forum. Its my pleasure to introduce todays speaker. Dr. Jennifer lawless is a professor of government at American University in washington, d. C. And the director of the women and politics institute. She describes herself this way im a 40yearold, selfavowed political junkie. [laughter] election day is my super bowl. [laughter] the sunday morning talk shows are my favorite reality tv. [laughter] and my computer Search History shows that politicalwire. Com is my mostvisited web site. This selfavowed political junkie graduated from Union Schedule in schenectady, new york. She has a ba in Political Science, she earned her m. A. From stanford university. She has co
[inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] everybody, welcome to this amazing talk. My im a ph. D student in the humanities group, doing research and a fellow of the center for ethics. So today we have kentaro, who is a professor at the university of Michigan School of information. He also founded Microsoft Research india, where he created a group that did technology for emerging markets. His talk today will be on the law of am mixification. A very amplification, a very interesting talk. And its kind of a heresy in some ways to have this talk, and the talk is aptly named geek heresy rescuing culture change from technology. It provokes important conversations because i think technology is important, but also important to think about what is the impact of the technology and how we design the technology in the best we way can. So without further adieu. Like to introduce kentaro here. [applause] thank you for that introduction, and id like to thank the center and m. I. T. For host
What is called the evasive passive. And accordingly, all the classic style guides advice against using the passive voice. Use the active voice. The active voice is usually more direct and vigorous than the passive. Many sentences can be made lively by substituting a transgent for a per puncher to perfunctory. Notice something fishingal the advice . It uses the passive voice to tell people not to use the passive voice. Similarly, the other iconic body of advice for writing happed out to every college freshman, George Orwells politics of the english language in which he says a mixture of vague yes and sheer incompetence is the most marked characteristic of modern prose. I list the way that prose construction is dodged. The passive voice is used in preference to the active which contains not one but two examples of the passive voice. Now, the passive voice, and, for that matter, any english construction could not have survived in the language for 1500 years unless it was doing something u
And i think its a fundamental misunderstanding of the technology. If you look at the congress of the United States that has anywhere between a 9 and 13 approval rate, and look at the most common profession its lawyers, okay . With respect to the lawyers in the audience, i took classes at the Harvard Law School when i was there, so im not antilawyer. But if you look at the chinese ruling party, the communist, you know, committee there, the ten members there all ten of them have ph. D. S in electrical engineering, some sort of advanced violence right . So fundamentally, they understand science. And i think the lack of s. T. E. M. Literacy on the part of our National Leadership and individual citizens is going to be a big problem that will lead to National Security threats that we dont understand. You talked about earlier about the subtitle of your book, that everyone is connected, and were only getting more connected because when out comes to Businesses Technology companies, this concept