Page 17 - Quos News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Quos. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Quos Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Nothing wrong with the phone call. no quid pro quo. quid pro quos could be okay. the trump administration is incapable of quitting a quid pro quo. a message from senior senator from south carolina, lindsey graham. . what i can tell you about the trump policy toward the ukraine, it was in coherency. it depends on who you talk to. they seem to be incapable of forming a quid pro quo. implausible deniability. things were a mess. could have been the case he didn t know what was going on. really? that s the best they can do. either the president is ignorant or corrupt. it s not either/or. it s both. with regard to the ignorant defense, we have seen that with regard to working with russians to get elected president the first time. ....
Time, and all of this ahead of the first impeachment hearings this week. take a listen. it is a group of legislators and the bottom line here, hall hallie, in the transcript, no quid pro quo, and the overall tone of the transcript is that it is mutually laudatory. and you can make your own decision, but from the quid pro quo aspect of the phone call, there is nothing there. if there was a quid pro quo, it certainly was not an effective one. there are perfectly appropriate quid pro quos and there are inappropriate quid pro quos. i am not going the read these tran scripts, and the whole process is a joke. what i can tell you about the trump policy toward ukraine is that it is incoherent, and depends who you talk to. they are incapable of forming a quid pro quo. i trust president zelensky and president trump and that they did not say that the aid ....
About. they don t want to discuss whether there was, in fact, a trade off here, an improper extortion of the ukrainians by the president. let s get into that a little bit horse. we have some republican reaction on that issue of quid pro quo which is at the heart of this probe. and it s a response that keeps on changing. listen to this. in this transcript there s no quid pro quo. there s no improper leverage. the overall tone of this transcript is that it s mutually laudatory. make your own decision but from a quid pro quo aspect of the phone call there s nothing there. if there was a quid pro quo it wasn t a very effective one. there are perfectly appropriate quid pro quos and there are inappropriate quid pro quos. i m not going to read these transcripts. the whole process is a joke. what i can tell you about the trump policies towards the ukraine, it was incoherent. ....
Who the whistle-blower is. how did this investigation start? and they totally are avoiding the evidence. we know why. if you read the transcripts that came out the last week, and i did that. well over thousands of pages now. it s clear any lawyer would love this case. multiple witnesses testifying to the same thing. multiple quid pro quos. even had fiona hill, the top russia expert at the nsc saying she believed or worried at the time that rudy giuliani who was in the mix here was breaking the law. so tremendous a tremendous case and so jim jordan and all the others, all they can do is get out there and distract and try to turn it into a circus so that people don t pay attention to these very basic, damning, incriminating facts. walter dellinger, do you see crimes here beyond the unspeakable corruption being exhibited by the trump administration? do you see crimes having been committed by people in trying to get this scheme to happen? well, my duke university ....
And sondland this week altered his testimony to acknowledge a quid pro quo as well. saying he told a ukrainian official that the resumption of u.s. aid would likely not occur until ukraine provided the public anticorruption statement. congressional republicans have struggled to defend the president, some acknowledging a quid pro quo but insisting it is not impeachable. there are perfectly appropriate quid pro quos. and there are inappropriate quid pro quos. and now, arguing if there was a quid pro quo, the president did not direct it. nobody has testified that there s a quid pro quo ordered by the president of the united states. instead, pointing the finger at sondland, a month ago the text message that i saw from ambassador sondland, who is highly respected, was there s no quid pro quo. but now let me just tell you, i ....