Page 21 - Quos News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Quos. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Quos Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Transcript. part of it is, well, even if it happened, it happens all the time and if it happened, it s not impeachable regardless. and what we re seeing, of course, with not just republicans in congress, but outside lackeys and acolytes like bill ben it is saying quid pro quos happen all the time and what s wrong with those? what we know is whether there was intent or not, there was a woman in texas who voted, not knowing she couldn t vote, who was sentenced to many years in prison because she violated the law, whether she knew it or not. the idea that attempted murder, attempted rape, attempted robbery are okay if nothing happens or because you didn t really know that it was illegal is almost laughable, but that s what they have been reduced to because the evidence is so powerful. that point, i ve seen this trotted out as well, michael, the attempted notion. the wall street journal has sort of tried this. ....
A link between a white house president and ukraine investigating anticorruption issues and he mentioned buresma and the dnc server. ambassador bill taylor said i think it is crazy to withhold secure assistance for the ukraine. and sondland responded the president has been crystal clear, no quid pro quos of any ki kind. i suggest we stop back and forth by text. joining me now, the msnbc analyst mimiroka. we re waiting for transcripts, and i don t know what it will do to thicken out what we know, but both volker and sondland have confirmed the basic under lying matter that there was ....
Again and again is always political. if the democrats want this to be taken seriously, they have to open up the process, be transparent and afford the president and the minority due process. if they don t, then the process is still a kangaroo court. they can pass all the resolutions that they want. this is the public s business and there is no reason this should be being done behind closed doors. brian: andy what you know other than the phone call. rudy was doing this and that. having said that does this rise to impeachment for you? it does not, brian. but i think that if the president wants to effectively defend himself, what he needs to do is get beyond, you know, talking about quid pro quos and talking about the conversation being perfect and explain why this is not impeachable under the circumstances. i think as long as he freezes his defense by saying this thing was perfect. then they are not going to make the main defense which is that it s not ....
And you have mick mulvaney, two weeks ago, saying well, there was a quid pro quo. basically confirming this inquiry s whole investigative point. so it is kind of hard for republicans to mount a serious defense of trump s behavior here. they have really been talking about the process. and now democrats are going to open up the process to public hearings soon to try to mollify some republican concerns. there is a suggestion that some republicans are saying hey, you know what, maybe it is better to say, there was a quid pro quo, big deal, there was no criminal act. there was no that is not an impeachable offense. not an impeachable offense. what do you think of that? even though the president himself has kind of contradicted himself in that same way in the way he treated it, saying it is an unimpeachable event. it is not a bad defense. in foreign policy, there are often many different quid pro quos. and in criminal law, the quid ....
Different theories out there, one in the beginning for republicans was let s attack the process, that the way this impeachment thing is unfolding is not credible. steve scalise calling it a soviet style proceeding. and then he didn t intend to break the law. he ultimately released the aid. that s another talking point we hear a lot about. it s becoming difficult for republicans, given the number of witnesses coming forward and testifying to what i said were two quid pro quos. not just the aid, but the white house meeting. it s getting very hard to say there was no quid pro quo. especially when you have that comment in the transcript do me a favor. the president immediately starts talking about the 2016 election, one. investigations he wanted open and later the bidens. it s hard for republicans to say there was no quid pro quo. right. if they do ultimately acknowledge that there was, and some of them privately are, then what? that s the question they re ....