And the doctor was pretty hopeful for that one either have the high fema. But he was still pretty upset, obviously that he had lost everything except his legs. So he was with us at least two weeks, which is usually the 14 days is usually the amount of time that they, that someone that seriously injured would be with us. And every day we would sit down and write a letter to his newlywed wife and then, his wife did get some letters through to him. So we would sit and read it to him and then we would sit and write some more letters for him. He was finally medevacs to japan. Then he ended up back in colorado, and he was one of the first bionic arms for the army. So he wrote to us. He wrote back to us to tell us this. And this was so important to us because we never knew whats happened to the fellows after they left us. And again, here he was supporting us, letting us know that he did okay. Even though things, hes already been to, he says i cant go any further. He said but i am going to mak
To school. Many counties bringing the kids back to class than 30 minutes. Well talk to the teachers and distracted just look like 0 snu0 you may have to get you kids up for work. Thank you for a lot of hospital the roads today a lot s[ a lot of people are heading back to school this week. Clouds over the bay bridgea they as we look off in that can see we have three area we are tracking like showers. Valley near stockton about wet weather is approaching the east catch them showers are places like the delta and rw÷ livermore. Reported by the radar but it makes it all another story. u5sn7s with a sidewalk take a picture and send it to us. Showers off a point raised forecast mouth whether temperatures in the 50sgv chance of a sprinkle. By this afternoon at noon8 temperatures mid70s inland at 3 00 pmed temperature low to mid 80s for inland that is a quick look on your forecast with an update on at the Richmond Center held prisoner and overturned accident around 5 50 am. Lots the residual
Not understood] cat tools and bull rushes [speaker not understood] removed in order to reduce obstructions to water flow into the pump intake structure. That is an indication of enhancing water flow at sharp park. I dont know what is. We didnt leave it at that. We also included in the record a deposition of the person who actually manages this pump for rec and Park Department, a guy named john [speaker not understood] and what he told us under oath is that the existing pumphouse, although it has a 10,000 gallon per minute capacity, currently only operates at about 6,000 gallons per minute. This is in exhibit b of the documents that we sent submitted to you. We asked them a question. We said, as best as you under it from your experience, if the [speaker not understood] are removed, the pumps would be able to get water out [speaker not understood] . Yes. Do you [speaker not understood]. Even a winter like last year when there was a lot of rain . An objection from attorneys on the other s
That flows through sharp park as its implemented. The easiest answer to explain is look at the project description. The project description says on page 4 the primary purpose of this project of the proposed construction includes to remove impediments to water flow within the wetland. It goes on on page 6 to say the sediment and emergent [speaker not understood] cat tools and bull rushes [speaker not understood] removed in order to reduce obstructions to water flow into the pump intake structure. That is an indication of enhancing water flow at sharp park. I dont know what is. We didnt leave it at that. We also included in the record a deposition of the person who actually manages this pump for rec and Park Department, a guy named john [speaker not understood] and what he told us under oath is that the existing pumphouse, although it has a 10,000 gallon per minute capacity, currently only operates at about 6,000 gallons per minute. This is in exhibit b of the documents that we sent subm
On the adoption without reference to committee calendar. Please note that Public Comment is not allowed on items already subject to Public Comment by a board committee. Please direct your remarks to the board as a whole, not to individual supervisors, nor to the audience. Speakers using translation assistance will be allow twice the amount of time. And if you would like a document to be displayed on the overhead projector, please clearly state such to sfgovtv and remove the document when the screen should return to live coverage of the meeting. Lets hear from our first speaker. You have two minutes. Yes, ill be making a display. My name is peter war field. Im executive direct r of Library Users association and i want to talk a little about the history of library secrecy and its ongoing bad effect. In 1988, San Francisco voters approved a 109 million bond program whose ultimate cost was 188 million. And to build a stateoftheart main library, new main library that would have room for dec