My childrens godfather is a former special forces group and he had a line he got from a commander somewhere in his career that said there are some peoplpeople just need killing. Some you will not be able to reason with or negotiate with and there is just evil in the world and that is kind of the approach he takes. He doesnt necessarily like it when he knows it needs to be done he went out and he does it. He runs through the bucs as a combination of multiple people that ive known in the world of government, diplomacy, part of government. Hhes actually named after somebody right here in dc who processes fisa warrants for the prophetic justice. So there is one over at doj, real life, and i hope it is a great name for a character. He is a collection of these people and then what i tell folks is that hes my alter ego. He gets to go and do the things my wife wont let me do. She let me go to afghanistan but she drew the line of chasing female operatives. So there is a line i cant cross. Host
I would love to see nine movies made. There seems to be a reluctance there that is misplaced. A lot of books that have nothing to do with islamic terrorism. In the code of conduct they all had to do with someone at the un. Hidden order was all about a series of murders taken place around boston. I normally dont say its about the fed when i publicize it because how could you make that sexy and be a thriller. Lets just one of several examples there was one muslim guy in it. It was one guy for all of that. Another theme intergovernmental intrigue. I talked to family members and things like this. Not close immediate family members. Francie tucker intrigue and i realize this is a same government that could not run the post office. All of the things that people want to put on dc makes for interesting fiction and i think we find it very easy to believe that there are forces behind the scene puppeteers that are controlling everything. I think that makes for interesting reading i grew up readin
Stayathome order, declarations and directive. They will attend via video conference. Public comment will be available on each item on this agenda. Both channel 26 and sfgovtv a streaming the number across the stream. Comments are available via phone by calling 4156550001. Again, thats 4156550001. The meeting id is 1455134299. Again, thats 1455134299. Press pound and pound again. When connected, you will hear the meeting discussions, but you will be muted. When your item comes up, press star 3 to be added to the speaker line. Best practices are to call from a quiet location, speak clearly and slowly and turn down your television and radio. You may submit Public Comment in either of the following ways email myself, and it will be forwarded to the supervisors and it will be included in the official file. Finally, items will be appear on the june 30th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you, and we have been joined by vice chairs safai and with that, could you please
Conference. Public comment will be available on each item on this agenda. Both channel 26 and sfgovtv a streaming the number across the stream. Comments are available via phone by calling 4156550001. Again, thats 4156550001. The meeting id is 1455134299. Again, thats 1455134299. Press pound and pound again. When connected, you will hear the meeting discussions, but you will be muted. When your item comes up, press star 3 to be added to the speaker line. Best practices are to call from a quiet location, speak clearly and slowly and turn down your television and radio. You may submit Public Comment in either of the following ways email myself, and it will be forwarded to the supervisors and it will be included in the official file. Finally, items will be appear on the june 30th board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you, and we have been joined by vice chairs safai and with that, could you please read the first item. Yes. Item number one is an ordinance amending the a
Revenue loss there that were seeing in that first fiscal year. Then this is where it gets intricate. A portion of those revenues that we are adjusting directly within our proposal, and that includes the dsfg baseline revenues. In addition, the Mayors Office did assume as part of its projections losses in primary care, Behavioral Health, and Population Health as well. So in addition, there are other revenues that were managed such as 1991 realignment that goes to support our budget, but we its not something that we manage centrally. So that sort of 59 million of negative that you see in that balancing sheet, its part of this 132 that you see here. So what im doing is essentially matching some of the losses that we have. We did have some improvement over this assumption. Even though the instructions, i think, were issued in the middle of may, i think may 18th, and we did work with the Mayors Office in early may, a lot has happened in those six months since we submitted our initial projec