brewster and mary moriarty, hennepin county s chief public defender. i turn to you first. another night of public protest and arrests and the officer being charged. what can you tell us? steph, good morning. 24 protests overnight after the fourth night in a row of demonstrations right here in front of the brooklyn center police department. we know the numbers grew over a couple hundred before 10:00, when the curfew was in effect. and we had hundreds of police and state patrol officers converge on the scene. we did not see the tear gas used last night as in prior nights. i think it s important to note the mayor of brooklyn center had gone on record saying he did not believe it was a main way to treat protesters. as a result of a small demonstrations we had seen. and as far as kim potter goes, yesterday she turned herself in on the charges of second degree manslaughter. the maximum fine is ten years. we already from the family of daunte wright in response to this. they say th
definitely more clout and it could be a bit dreary and damp but much brighter, much drier and just the odd shower and nothing in comparison with today and tomorrow and then high pressure will keep the weather fronts at bay as we go into the weekend, pushing those weather fronts to the north and west which means a lot of dry weather and yes, there will be chilly nights, but it will feel pleasant by day. a reminder of our top story. as we start to emerge from lockdown, the calls for vaccine passports. the prime minister ordered a review. now it s time to get the news where you are. £1. hello, and welcome to sportsday i m chetan pathak. coming up on tonight s programme. a power broker like no other. we hear from one of football s most controversial super agents about the criticism he s faced. if this man is so greedy and so bad and so, i don t know, what have been called how the hell are all of his players so happy and stay with him? the lionesses are roaring again ellen wh
questions, ladies and gentlemen. raise more questions that we wouldn t have to be dealing with if they had simply secured maggie s phone on june 8th when they got it, we wouldn t be here. so we do know from the timeline that alex left the property at 9:07. were they killed before he left? y don t know the answer to that. i don t know the answer to that. we do know if he was in the house when the shots were made down at the kennel, that he would not have heard them. we had decibel testing from mr. sutton. they were angry with mr. suttons test, not angry, challenged his conclusion on many things, they didn t touch his acoustic testing. didn t doubt that, haven t challenged that. if he s in the house, and shots are ringing down at the kennel, he doesn t hear them. he doesn t hear them. now they say that sometime after 8:44, and they peg it 8:48, 8:50, that is when paul last responded to a text from this friend of his, they ignore the fact there had to be clean-up. buster testifi
have to be consistent with each other and have to point conclusively to the guilt of alex murdaugh, beyond a reasonable doubt. these circumstances just raise more questions, ladies and gentlemen. raise more questions that we wouldn t have to be dealing with if they had just simply secured mag maggie s phone on june 8th when they got it. we wouldn t be here. we do know from the time line that alex left the property at 9:07. were they killed before he left? i don t know the answer to that. i don t know the answer to that. we do know that if he was in the house when the shots were made down at the kennel that he would not have heard them. we had testing from mr. sutton. they were angry with mr. sutton s not angry, but they challenged his conclusions on a lot of things. they didn t touch his acoustic testing. didn t doubt that. haven t challenged that. if he is in the house and shots are down at the kennel, he doesn t hear it. they say that sometime after 8:44 they peg it 8:4
Maggie s phone, driving maggie s phone, throwing maggie s phone out is it s such a stretch for them to come in and try to put her phone in his hand. then you start thinking through, why would alex take her phone and not paul s phone? start there. why would alex take her phone and not paul s phone? that s a question i don t have an answer to. it makes no sense. it makes no sense why he would take maggie s phone if there s nothing on there. he knows her password. put it in. see what it is. we know from all the phone data her phone was never unlocked. he had the keys. if he is taking her phone to unlock or to do something with it, he didn t. why? why? why? why? these are circumstances that