have to be consistent with each other and have to point conclusively to the guilt of alex murdaugh, beyond a reasonable doubt. these circumstances just raise more questions, ladies and gentlemen. raise more questions that we wouldn t have to be dealing with if they had just simply secured mag maggie s phone on june 8th when they got it. we wouldn t be here. we do know from the time line that alex left the property at 9:07. were they killed before he left? i don t know the answer to that. i don t know the answer to that. we do know that if he was in the house when the shots were made down at the kennel that he would not have heard them. we had testing from mr. sutton. they were angry with mr. sutton s not angry, but they challenged his conclusions on a lot of things. they didn t touch his acoustic testing. didn t doubt that. haven t challenged that. if he is in the house and shots are down at the kennel, he doesn t hear it. they say that sometime after 8:44 they peg it 8:4
Maggie s phone, driving maggie s phone, throwing maggie s phone out is it s such a stretch for them to come in and try to put her phone in his hand. then you start thinking through, why would alex take her phone and not paul s phone? start there. why would alex take her phone and not paul s phone? that s a question i don t have an answer to. it makes no sense. it makes no sense why he would take maggie s phone if there s nothing on there. he knows her password. put it in. see what it is. we know from all the phone data her phone was never unlocked. he had the keys. if he is taking her phone to unlock or to do something with it, he didn t. why? why? why? why? these are circumstances that
911. you can hear it. he says, i ve been up to it now, it s bad. he doesn t remember the sequencing. i don t think anyone should hold that against him. mr. waters gets up here and says, maggie was running to her baby. alex was running to his baby. can you imagine what he saw? is it evidence of guilt that he doesn t remember what the sequencing was in that moment? is that evidence? is that evidence of guilt?
Condition of paul and maggie, particularly paul. i m not going to show you any photos. i think you would agree that it was so bad, it was so bad. alex, in the back of the car, with me in the back, you could see me in the camera, sitting there talking to agent owen and agent craw. he says, it bad. said he said i did them so bad. i think the evidence is everyone who listened to it and knows what alex was talking about says they did them so bad. agent owen doesn t say to you,
Or is that evidence of trauma? this is a guy that went to get a shotgun and he put 16 gauge shells in it. he knows the difference. he didn t know that night. i m not quite understanding what the state makes of this. did he not go up to their bodies? the forensic evidence speaks to the contrary. what we have is maggie s dna all over his t-shirt. you heard that from the agent. we have paul s dna on his t-shirt. how did he get paul and maggie s dna on his t-shirt if he didn t touch them? if he brutally murdered them, hosed off down there next to the dead bodies, got in a golf cart naked, drove to the house, changed clothes, went to his