At first, i wanted to bring in. [inaudible] i said, let me think about thisi came back and we had six meetings but i didnt succeed obviously. Why did he want to bring him back on board if he could see the turnout was needed in order to win the election . Its very simple. At that time there was a turn in the direction with more reliance on that kind of forces and less on the technocrats. We work very closely as it was less panicky. There were institutions created and we must allow them to do their work and try to insist that they do their property. That had to be there. I remember during the period this is anecdotal. The second day that he was there he was in helmand and i saw the president before and i said mr. President , can we go down to the office because you never know. So they went downstairs and i said to the president it was a very emotional meeting. If you do not accept the second round and then i accept that strategy because if the president doesnt follow the constitution, th
Since 2007 and be under the age of 16 when you came, but you had to be in school, you had to have graduated from high school, you had to have attained a General Education Development certificate or be an honorably discharged veteran of the coast guard or the United States army. You cant do all that, unless you were here before 2007. So without objection, ill include the homeland Securities Development for deferred action in the list of items. Let me ask you, is it not true that president obama has deported more migrants than any president in u. S. History . That is correct, mr. Chairman. As a matter of fact, some have called him the deporter in chief. Now, it seems to me that congress has failed to act in its reform of the immigration system. In the absence of that system, what has been congress successful role is to dramatically increase border Customs Enforcement to the point where we have had the most deportations than at any other time. Let me ask two final questions. Are all 60,00
Period. The are russians have flown ons. Several yearlong missions. Its but if we look at the tools wih weve got today we can see if ht theres anything in the human system, to see if there is that something that degrades that hasnt reached study grade in terms of human degradation in keeping humans alive. How important is it to simulate a mars mission in lower earth orbit that way, and how close do you have to make it to a real mars mission to be a ma value . Do you build i n the to communication delay, do you block the windows, so they dont get to look at earth . How do you design Something Like that . Its interesting, we talked o about that. We do some things now, we do o were doing a lot of procedures, now aboard the station that are autonomous. Where the crews do the operatioe without any ground involvement. That was geared specifically do towards the mars environment where the time delay doesnt it. Allow the ground team to oesnt interact with the crew. So were doing those. He we t
3d printing and regulations on connected cars and soft riding vehicles. Next a panel on the development of tracking technology and its use in disaster relief, finding lost air liners and people. This event was posted by the new america foundation, its an hour and ten minutes. Thank you very much. Well, welcome, everybody, thanks for coming out. Were here to talk about technology and so many so much of the time we tend to turn to technology to solve our problems. And we have gotten so good at it that a lot of Times Technology solves those problems before we really had a chance to think about whether the problems are really entirely problems or maybe theres something that were losing in the process as well. Maybe that thing that we solved also was beneficial to us in some ways. And so tonight, what were going to talk about, the way that technology has made our lives better, maybe it has taken something away from our lives. My name is jeff wise, as you have heard, im a science journalist
And its credible, probably to the extent more credible because its safe, its guarded and it can be called forward when it needs to, and it can be substituted with something thats strategic and gets there fast. From that standpoint, its true. There is a value, though, to something that you can go back and say, its here, and people practice, et cetera, and thats the political side of this equation, which is very important. In the pacific, weve done it differently as a nation for the United States to what we have done in europe. It can work either way. It really is in the eyes of the beholder and what do allies really feel they need for us to be convinced that, well honor our commitments. I think this is a broader problem with nato again. That is we have gotten ourselves comfortable with the idea that allies can agree to a mission and assume that it doesnt mean that. So we agree, yeah, nato will take on this thing, but does it mean im going to commit military forces to carry this out . An