Stay updated with breaking news from Naveed jatt. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Give an s, ends with t, about ukraine. ambassador sondland agreed that the president did not give an s about ukraine. i asked why not. ambassador sondland stated that the president only cares about big stuff. i noted that there was big stuff going on in ukraine, like a war with russia, and ambassador sondland replied that he means big stuff that benefits the president, like the biden investigation that mr. giuliani was pushing. donald trump pushed for that investigation on an open line, cell phone line, that he three years in as being president must know that foreign countries can listen to. what do you make of the fact that he was willing to essentially incriminate himself on a cell phone call. let me further what naveed was saying there and what mr mr. pfeiffer said. this is not only usual, this is an unprecedented violation of national security. and here s why. donald trump was running a secret dirty tricks team whose sole function was to go to ukraine and get information so ....
Deciding that he will take the chance on getting a pardon. yeah. you know, we want to give kudos to all of those who testified, because mr. kent and the ambassador on wednesday were also excellent, but i have to say, it s the women that have shown the courage to actually step forward and not be scared at donald trump tweeting at them. malcolm will be back later. thank you john, naveed and everyone else. coming up, president trump is guilty and republicans have the sideshow bob defense. convicted of a crime i didn t even commit. ha! attempted murder. now honestly, what is that? do they give a nobel prize for attempted chemistry? do they? attempted chemistry? do they? (burke) at farmers insurance, we ve seen almost everything so we know how to cover almost anything. (bert) even a not-so-handy monster. (johnson) what is going on in here! i can t hear myself think! (grover) what does it look like, sir? i am here to help you with your water heater. (johnson) oh! [sighs defeatedly] ( ....
Out there of joe biden and his son and ukraine without getting into details about what he did when talking to the president of ukraine. in terms of what he did, bob, former fbi double agent naveed jamali had a different take on this complaint, saying this whistle-blower may have just been concerned that they were being asked to break the law. here s what he said, naveed. here it is. i think this is beyond just the phone calls. i think most likely there was a follow-up action or actions that were meant to reinforce this push to get ukraine to help him. i don t think that the person saw the transcript of the phone call, was in the room with the president, rather, i think it s more likely that they were involved in actually the subsequent action. this could be something as simple as this person got this order, they were ordered to act on this specific thing, and they were concerned about breaking the law. but i think it was also much more practical, which was they probably didn t want ....
They were trying to go after these videos that had been put up, it was like a whack-a-mole game. they were popping.everywhere. we have an expectation of freedom of speech. when you sign up for any internet service providerer or twitter, you agree to terms of giving a clear license for any of these places to suspend accounts, suspend anything that vi lays terms of service. you don t have an expectation of freedom of speech on a privately owned platform. they should do a lot more. it s a challenge in that they re using algorithms. t they re doing actually a pretty good job. naveed, i hope safe travels and go forth and good luck with everything. . the political undertones to the college admission scandal and how washington is responding ....
What no one is discussing is the actual impact this has in terms of the national security, which is what you re saying, rev. this is something that has a chilling impact at a time which maybe a lot of people aren t going to want to join the intelligence community to begin with. if they re looking at this and saying, my goodness, i could have my security clearance revoked because of my political beliefs, that s just chilling. i think that what bothers me more than anything, matt, is that what he just said, what naveed just said. young people that want to get into the intelligence community that now become frozen, saying, wait a minute, if i get in, am i no longer going to be able to even just in casual conversations, family outings, express myself? where are we going to draw the line here on where i can be in a position where my security clearance is revoked and that follow me on my resume the rest of my life? and could impact my ability to ....