united states is not a traitor to the united states. the president of the united states is not a spy for vladimir putin. the president of the united states has been wrongly accused for two and a half years, had his administration just so bothered, so harassed by these political operatives sean: let me ask you this. and yet he has managed to be successful. sean: let s imagine jim jordan, mark meadows, matt gaetz, doug collins and others have a chance to question mueller.r they want to know when he knew there was no collusion. you had a broad mandate, when did you have time for fara violations a that are never invoked, and taxi medallions, and loan applications, and tax violations by the way, always pay your taxes, don t lie on loan applications, we ve got ity but with the broad mandate, he didn t look at all into the russian dossier, what
then attorney general barr anden the special counsel s office had to clean up badly, and i think frankly, the attorney generalhe threw mueller a lifeline, because didn t remember what he said, or he didn t write it, ore he doesn t know, which is even worse. why do i suspect this is notot going to go well for him at all? it isn t. we are going back down memory lane. nadler and schiff remind me of high school athletes, they graduated from high school, and now nobody recognizes them. they are offended that they are outside the mainstream of public consciousness now. nobody knows who they are or what they are doing. they have been forgotten, so they are desperate questing for attention, they re dragging back robert mueller.ra robert mueller has already told them, in no uncertain terms, that his testimony will stick exactly to the mueller report. it is there all in writing, if people are truly interested in it, i m interested in the conclusion. the conclusion said there is no collusion. t
mueller.th sean: i would like to knowld why he sent strzok and page s phones back to the manufacturer to get cleaned. by the way, did he fire them or was it mccabe? because mccabe says it wasn t mueller. he needs to tread very carefully in this hearing, or he is going to be the subject of an investigation. sean: let me tell you something, i don t think bill barr can bail him out anymore than he already did, that was my read on it. was that your read? sean, i ve got a pretty simple question for robert mueller: when did you know there was no collusion, and why did the investigation goio past that point? i think a lot of people want to know the answer. i would also call into question his political motivation. what motivated him to go out and give that press conference if it wasn t just to give more fuel to democrats for impeachment? his report had already been out in the public domain almost in full.n the attorney general and then deputy attorney general rod rosenstein already cam
hillary s victory party, didn t turn out that way. only democrats you know about that, sean sean: andrew weissmann s atrocious history even with all of the staff he had listen, hang on a second. the 2800 subpoenas, 500 witnesses, all of this, the basis on the investigation was what? collusion, conspiracy. and what did bob mueller conclude? there was none. even with those people. and i want to know the same thing when did you know this was not the case? it had to be early on, because even peter strzok said early on, there is no there there. that was peter strzok s words. of course, they can t show that in his text messages anymore because they let the phone get wiped out when he left. sean: jay sekulow reissued one of the phones to somebody else, because the federal government can t afford an iphone. sean: this is not going to work out the way they think, trust me. jay sekulow, counsel to the president, also big news yesterday. there is other news coming up
because the president did not commit a crime, but we are nottt exonerating him, either. the job of the prosecutor is no, to exonerate. they either bring a case or they do not. they did not, that is whato is important here. bob mueller is going to have to testify that they did not.ng i can t imagine it s going to be any different than his report, but i m going to say this again, a lot of questions that have to be asked here and have to be answered. in the scope of his testimony, we ll find out what that will be, but i don t expect it to be any different than this report. at the end of the day, what the report finds: no collusion, conspiracy, however you want to phrase it. no obstruction. bill barr said with rod rosenstein that there is no obstructive intent. a lot of the theories floatedio around by the media were, in my view, absurd, but at the end of the day, the case is closed, it s done. now testifying, he will have to answer questions and hard questions for him to answer. i ve al