because the president did not commit a crime, but we are nottt exonerating him, either. the job of the prosecutor is no, to exonerate. they either bring a case or they do not. they did not, that is whato is important here. bob mueller is going to have to testify that they did not.ng i can't imagine it's going to be any different than his report, but i'm going to say this again, a lot of questions that have to be asked here and have to be answered. in the scope of his testimony, we'll find out what that will be, but i don't expect it to be any different than this report. at the end of the day, what the report finds: no collusion, conspiracy, however you want to phrase it. no obstruction. bill barr said with rod rosenstein that there is no obstructive intent. a lot of the theories floatedio around by the media were, in my view, absurd, but at the end of the day, the case is closed, it's done. now testifying, he will have to answer questions -- and hard questions for him to answer. i've always wanted to know what happened to the evidence -- what happened to peter strzok's