won t come on. i hear that, and i also see that hillary s russian dossier and robert mueller didn t bring up any of that. why? i think you answer the question.. he had no intention of bringing that up because he and the people on his team were going after president trump, and they had nothing there. i think another major questionon that mueller is going to have to answer i think it is a huge mistake for him to come in and testify, by the way. he is going to have to answer, the second you knew that information about how the fisa warrant was obtained by false information and he knew it why did you not go back to that court? you have an obligation, as the chief prosecutor on this case, an ethical and moral obligation to take it back to the fisa court, and he did not do that, as far as we know. sean: how does he justify that, but he violations?o that s a broad mandate.
hillary s victory party, didn t turn out that way. only democrats you know about that, sean sean: andrew weissmann s atrocious history even with all of the staff he had listen, hang on a second. the 2800 subpoenas, 500 witnesses, all of this, the basis on the investigation was what? collusion, conspiracy. and what did bob mueller conclude? there was none. even with those people. and i want to know the same thing when did you know this was not the case? it had to be early on, because even peter strzok said early on, there is no there there. that was peter strzok s words. of course, they can t show that in his text messages anymore because they let the phone get wiped out when he left. sean: jay sekulow reissued one of the phones to somebody else, because the federal government can t afford an iphone. sean: this is not going to work out the way they think, trust me. jay sekulow, counsel to the president, also big news yesterday. there is other news coming up
that s a pretty far stretch. taxi medallions? okay, whatever. that was a broad mandate. but you are not going to deal with the russian dossier that is unverifiable, that was used to spy on, let s see, the opposition party, and then the transition, and then the president of the united states of america? how did he miss that little detail?? oh, he didn t miss the detail, in my opinion, he just chose not to bring it out, because it hurt the case. and he is going to have to answer to all of that, and he is going to have some really, really tough questions sean: did you think when you watched him for the nine and a half minutes, i almost felt he had not read i felt he washe reading it for the first time. he was stumbling all over the place. or didn t know what somebody else wrote, i didn t know what to think. what did you think? i only have five seconds, ten seconds. i think he thought he was a smart man who was going to get away with it. i used to think he was an ethical man. aft
because the president did not commit a crime, but we are nottt exonerating him, either. the job of the prosecutor is no, to exonerate. they either bring a case or they do not. they did not, that is whato is important here. bob mueller is going to have to testify that they did not.ng i can t imagine it s going to be any different than his report, but i m going to say this again, a lot of questions that have to be asked here and have to be answered. in the scope of his testimony, we ll find out what that will be, but i don t expect it to be any different than this report. at the end of the day, what the report finds: no collusion, conspiracy, however you want to phrase it. no obstruction. bill barr said with rod rosenstein that there is no obstructive intent. a lot of the theories floatedio around by the media were, in my view, absurd, but at the end of the day, the case is closed, it s done. now testifying, he will have to answer questions and hard questions for him to answer. i ve al
bottom line, after all of the looking, and all the time and money you spent, did trump collude with thene russians? no. do you stand by your report? yes. did you turn it over to the attorney general about obstruction? and the attorney general said i did, and i m not going to revisit it. so it is case closed for me. they can do anything they want to in the house, and i think it will blow up in their faces. sean: i think let s go u back to some of the other questions. how do you justify hiring hillary s attorney, onlyow democrats? andrew weissmann? he couldn t find one republican? not one?ts it will blow up in theiran face. this will blow up in their face. the conclusions can t change, t there is no collusion, that was with the whole thing was about. nobody on earth could bring the obstruction case based on these facts. the president gave 1.4 million documents to mueller. his lawyer testified for 30 hours, he made everybody available to mueller thatt mueller wanted to talk to, an