hillary s victory party, didn t turn out that way. only democrats you know about that, sean sean: andrew weissmann s atrocious history even with all of the staff he had listen, hang on a second. the 2800 subpoenas, 500 witnesses, all of this, the basis on the investigation was what? collusion, conspiracy. and what did bob mueller conclude? there was none. even with those people. and i want to know the same thing when did you know this was not the case? it had to be early on, because even peter strzok said early on, there is no there there. that was peter strzok s words. of course, they can t show that in his text messages anymore because they let the phone get wiped out when he left. sean: jay sekulow reissued one of the phones to somebody else, because the federal government can t afford an iphone. sean: this is not going to work out the way they think, trust me. jay sekulow, counsel to the president, also big news yesterday. there is other news coming up
because the president did not commit a crime, but we are nottt exonerating him, either. the job of the prosecutor is no, to exonerate. they either bring a case or they do not. they did not, that is whato is important here. bob mueller is going to have to testify that they did not.ng i can t imagine it s going to be any different than his report, but i m going to say this again, a lot of questions that have to be asked here and have to be answered. in the scope of his testimony, we ll find out what that will be, but i don t expect it to be any different than this report. at the end of the day, what the report finds: no collusion, conspiracy, however you want to phrase it. no obstruction. bill barr said with rod rosenstein that there is no obstructive intent. a lot of the theories floatedio around by the media were, in my view, absurd, but at the end of the day, the case is closed, it s done. now testifying, he will have to answer questions and hard questions for him to answer. i ve al
dan bongino, i know you would do it. geraldo would do it. i would do it. yeah, and sean, even worse, you look at peter strzok s texts from the day lindsey graham asked sally yates and of flynn, peter strzok and his texts to lisa page says hey, this unmasking thing is the incorrect narrative. sean, i ask you, what do you think he means by that? is it possible there was a fisa on flynn, too? i think that might be one of the next shoes to drop, stay tuned for that one. sean: wait a minute, it was leaked intelligence on flynn,, raw, leaked intelligence, and they told him no lawyer, bragged about setting him all right, i ve got to let you both go. geraldo, thank you. dan bongino, thank you. now on the phone to react to this breaking news, there is a lot of it, good, mueller has agreed to testify on july 17th., he is the council for the president, president trump s
attorney, jay sekulow, and on with us last night. jay, i have a few questions for mueller that i think guys like jim jordan, mark meadows, and doug collins and matt gaetz would ask, when did he know there was no collusion? why did he have such a broad mandate to focus on violations, taxi medallions, loan applications, years and years and decades-old tax issues? he knew about the dirty russian dossier, how does he answer the question about why he never, ever, you know, looked into that? i don t think there s a good answer for him. the first thing he needs to answer is his own conflicts of interest. he was interviewed for the fbibi director s job, didn t get it, and becomes special counsel the next day. f so that is one.di as the president said, he had a business dispute that was long-standing, so you have that one. and then you have it was interesting in the last panel, the discussion aboutas peter strzok and lisa page.
ask questions hard questions about strzok and page. who gave conflicting testimony right now? who fired peter strzok? andrew mccabe said he did. bob mueller s office said he did. one of them did and one of them did not, so somebody is not telling the truth. we will find that out.s that s number one. you put that in the context of everything, it will be an interesting hearing. i don t think the conclusion is going to change anything of what happens here, but people willil hear from bob mueller. i don t think we will get anything different than theng statement he made a couple weeks back, but he s going to answer some real questions, ones that have gone unanswered so far. sean: jay, i watched that nine and a half minute press conference, and god bless our media mob, conspiracy theorists, liars, hoaxsters, because for a few hours they thought they had it all. wait a minute, mueller said thed reason he couldn t consider indictment because of doj policy, and constitutional issues.