Been postponed until the 2024 election. Trump was set to be sentenced two weeks from now after being found guilty of 34 felony counts in his new york hush money case back in may. The case had widely been seen as the only criminal case against trump with the potential to cross the proverbial finish line before the election. As of today, we know that will not happen. Trump will now be sentenced on november 26th. Three weeks after the election. Here is how the judge overseeing the case judge marchand explained his reasoning for that dehraeufplt this matter is one that stands alone in a unique place in this nation s history. Unfortunately we are now at a place in time that is fraught with complexities. Rending the hearing difficult to execute. Thus the imposition of sentence will be adjourned to avoid any appearance however unwarranted, that the proceeding had been affected by or seeks to affect the approaching presidential election in which the defendant is a candidate. The court is a fai
And started laying the groundwork for this relationship moving forward, and its something that if you dont know the work that pen does, its very linked to what we will be talking about tonight in many ways but pen is an Amazing Organization that advocates for authors, for freedom of the press, important things that are tied to the mission we have as well through magic city books and the tulsa literary coalition. Pen is a membership driven program, organization, and if you dont in the their work good to pen. Org and see everything that theyre doing, especially right now. Theres so much going on with limp additions to press limitations to press freedoms. Every day something is happening that we didnt probably know about, at least i wouldnt know about were it not for the work at pen. We have a special membership promo go to website pen. Org and use the code pen friend, all caps, penfriedn sketch and get 20 off membership. So support pen and the great work we as an organization do and more
Test captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2008 i used to tell the students on the advice of counsel i will not answer that. I talk to Justice Brandeis on campus every day. That should not make you nervous. When i tell you hes talking back to me that should make you nervous. When questions emerge as to the constitutionality of the search of a cell phone i am confident Justice Brandeis with would not ask what James Madison thought about the use of a cell phone. I am equally confident with regard to what jeffrey said with regard to business business, i think it is important the power of big business in 1905 was not because they were providing substantial amounts of money to fund campaign, the power of big business came because they were paying off ledgislators through patronage. That was the means by which big business, there was enormous business, the names mentioned today are museums in new york, melon, guggenheim, enormous concentration of wealth which we are once again re
Sunday, october 4th, a at noon eastern on book tv on cspan2. And now, Georgetown University law center previews the Upcoming Supreme Court term including one case challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care act. They also talk about the potential for lawsuits concerning the 2020 elections that may reach the Supreme Court for consideration and reflects on the passing of Ruth Bader Ginsburg and her legacy in the court and the legal profession. This is about two hours. Welcome, everyone, to our annual Supreme Court term preview. Im executive director of the Supreme Court institute at georgetown law. Before we get started with todays scheduled program, i want to take the opportunity to acknowledge the passing of Justice Ginsburg. She was a trail blazing civil rights lawyer, a giant of a juress and a larger than life human being. But what i will remember most about her is her indom spirit. That and the devastate iing ser of questions she hurled my way at oral argument in the wi
Cofounder of the robert h. Jackson center we are thrilled to have this opportunity to commemorate one of Justice Jacksons foremost opinions, if not his number one, West Virginia v. Barnett. We have history with individuals we will be interviewing. To kind of recap back in 2002, i believe, i tracked down marie and Lillian Barnett and had a chance down in the charleston area. I didnt know you knew what was happening but all of a sudden this guy with a camcorder tracked you down, went to a kingdom hall and had a chance to chat. You were gracious enough to put up with me. Some of the interviews you just saw in 2006, we had a chance to bring the barnett sisters here and together with our friends at cspan filmed a presentation with professor barrett that Robert Jackson biographer and bennett bossski, the law clerk for justice stone during the barnett case. That was really cool. And a few years ago i had the privilege, together with phil donahue you saw clips on, to meet judith and to intervi