Safer borders and ultimately, a more efficient promote Justice System. At the same time, Facial Recognition systems have clear potential for misuse and have found to be inaccurate at identifying certain groups of people. Moreover, the technology and how it has been used in prosecution raises constitutional concerns that call into question the basic tenets of fairness and due process, underpinning all criminal prosecutions. The criminal consequences implicated by these darker elements werent closer examination by this body. Congress has found itself at a disadvantage. The information on how Law Enforcement agencies have adopted facial Recognition Technology remains underreported or nonexistent. Today, we are beginning facial Recognition Technology out of the shadows and into the light. This dialogue must start with a simple question about whether this technology is sufficiently accurate to justify its use by the police and if the risk of depriving someone of their liberty unjustly is to
Williams filed a lawsuit against the Detroit Police after they used facial Recognition Technology that falsely identified him as a shoplifting suspect. He talked about the experience and the negative impact its had on his family in a hearing held by the House Judiciary Committee subcommittee on crime and national security. As i said, good Morning And Welcome to a very important hearing, one that i hope will generate not only an understanding, but as i will ask a number of witnesses, legislative fixes that may be relevant and important in this rise of technology, matched against a document that has been a living document for more than a century obviously centuries, and that is the constitution of the United States of america. Like many other leaps forward in technology, facial Recognition Technology offers our society both promise and peril. Proponents extolled the potential benefits of modernized policing, greater certainty in Law Enforcement, safer borders and ultimately a more effici
Generate not only understanding but as i will ask a number of witnesses legislative fix thats may be important in this rise of technology matched against a document matches against a document that has been a living document for more than a century obviously centuries, and that is the constitution of the United States of america. Like many other leaps forward in technology, facial Recognition Technology offers our society both promise and peril. Proponents extolled the potential benefits of modernized policing, greater certainty in Law Enforcement, safer borders and ultimately a more efficient criminal Justice System. At the same time, Facial Recognition systems have clear potential for misuse, have been found to be inaccurate at identifying certain groups of people. Ial for misuse and have found to be inaccurate at identifying certain groups of people. Moreover, the technology and how it has been used in prosecution raises constitutional concerns that call into question the basic tenet
Practice litigation. How it works and how Tort Reform doesnt help. When doctors make mistakes, it can be devastating for the patients and the doctors. We have a medical Malpractice System that exists to compensate injured patients, patients who are injured as a result of a physicians mall practice, but malpractice, but it also exists to deter malpractice by physicians. There is a fierce debate on whether or not the medical Malpractice Liability System works. In that debate, anecdotes often substitute for data. At the cato institute, we were very excited to publish this book. It has a collection of politically diverse coauthors. Theres five of them, bernard black, and others. Four of them are Law Professors. One of them is an economics professor. One of them is here with us today to present the findings from this book which is really a compilation of more than a decade of peerreviewed articles from law journals looking at what actually happens in a medical Malpractice System. But throug
They resulted in his internal malpractice. And just to determine malpractice is a fierce debate about whether the medical Malpractice Liability System works and in that debate. At the Cato Institute we were excited to publish. David hyman, Charlie Silver Law professor and one economics professor, one is with us today to present the findings from this book which is a compilation of more than a decade of peerreviewed articles what happened to the medical Malpractice System. Through this book they made their findings accessible we are very pleased to have with us and moving. She is the Heart And Lung Transplant Surgeon you may know him as afore represented or from 199,422,006 and in 2003 became the Majority Leader of the u. S. Senate until his voluntary retirement from the senate in 2007 he was instrumental in the passage of the Modernization Act of 2003 and legislation. He currently serves as Vanderbilt University and the bipartisan Policy Center and host of its own podcast which is titl