decision. just a few days ago cbs news ran a pole asking americans about this very issue. 70% responded that colleges should not be allowed to use race in college admissions. a new york times poll recently found 60% of democrats also oppose race as a factor in admissions. americans across the country have rejected affirmative action at the ballot box too, even in blue state california. in the 2020 election democratic leaders in the state put affirmative action on the ballot. the pro- affirmative action activist, the governor, u.s. senators and the golden state warriors pushed voters to support the initiative. they out bid opponents of affirmative action by 19-1. in the end, nearly 60% of californians voted to kill affirmative action. it didn t work. no matter how hard the democratic party tries, no matter how much money they spend, the american people have rejected the view that we should be judged on our skin color. so if anyone is trying to hold on to the past like the demo
everyone agrees. this after a group of asian-american students filed a complaint against harvard and the university of north carolina chapel hill alleging that they failed to employ employee race neutral admissions practices. the majority opinion delivered by chief justice john roberts said that any student, quote, must be treated based on his or her experiences as an individual, not on the basis of race. highlighting the importance of this case in a rare move. justices clarence thomas and sonya sotomayor also read their opinions from the bench. now with justice thomas declaring, quote, at all forms discrimination based on race including so-called affirmative action are prohibited under the constitution. now harvard did in fact released a statement following the decision acknowledging that the court ruled their admissions policies did not comply with the 14th amendment, the equal protection clause in the constitution and the civil rights act. harvard is not actually totally b
decision. first what the president just said, speaking live from the white house, i strongly, strongly disagree with the court s decision. he said the court walked away from decades of precedent and called this not a normal court. what was your reaction to what you just heard? my reaction is that actually the supreme court is finally bringing into alignment education law with employment law. for over 40 years the supreme court has been more conservative on employment law and has restricted use of race motivated by interests like diversity or equity or systemic racism or societal discrimination. so really, i find the court s opinion today really to just be reaffirming what the court has held in other areas the fact we should not use race as a justification for any decision-making. andrew, we got word from the justice department and the attorney general with a statement, the supreme court s decision undercuts efforts by universities across the country to create a diverse gr
the supreme court s six three decision striking down the use of racial preferences in college admissions. biden was sentpreferen out by wr winds him up to lie. aff affirmative action is so s misunderstood. many people wrongly believe that affirmative action allows unequal white students, unqualified students to be admitted ahead of qualifie d. this is not this is not how college admissions work. now, the white house comms people aren t that ignorant.w th they know the truth that the entire point of preferences is to give minority candidates an edg me, regardless ofheir their test scores or the transcripts, or resume trani it s classic discrimination and it s based on race. colleges set out standards for admission and every student, every student has to meet those standards. meeand only that after firstmen meeting, the qualifications required by the school to college forget other factors. in additio other factorsn to thh such as race. okaasy what s less believablb that h
without it. rachel, i think my patients are because when your appetite is zoned down and insulin is working better these discussion, especially mounjaro effects two appetite receptors in the brain and stomach. you rye really start craving after a while healthier foods. it s also anti-aging treatment, rachel, believe it or not, because it when you are stabilizing insulin, which is a hormone that doesn t work as well as we get older, you know, not only are you able to burn fat, which is what insulin does, cure exercise more efficiently, you are also building bone and muscle. and when we re young we are burning fat and what else are we doing? building muscle and bone. so there are a lot of very positive effects no. one is saying that lifestyle is not important. but so many of the patients have come to see me and my new york city practice have really they know how to eat and they just noticed a real change in their body when they become insulin resistant. the weight my not go u