Not credible as a matter of law is not something that judges really do i think that to a certain extent the judge was cutting through and saying the standard here is that no reasonable juror could possibly find on these facts and that usually is successful. If the evidence produced the trial skips and element entirely, you have no evidence of a Shooting Evidence is somebody got shot and then they just forget to bring in the autopsy so that nobody actually testifies the guy died. Then you ask for judgment as a matter of law that acquitting on the murder case because there was no evidence of a death and so its unlikely to do here and so i think the judge is kinda needling todd a little bit there with the with the whole idea of not quite able as a matter of law, i will say though these types of motions, even though from the defense sayyed, you know that youre unlikely to win its very useful to prepare for the closing because you kind of preview your argument and then you see what the pros
Law
Closings
Matter
Closing
Quick
Work
Issue
Prosecution
Side
Whatever
Arguments
Appeal
him advice and counsel. i was aware of everything going out of the department of justic justice. that general sessions wasn t recused from. i think the president was comfortable that you continue the momentum of that affirmative justice, we have established in addressing these important parity issues like reducing violent crime, combating the opioid crisis, and others of the president felt i was the best position to do the duties of attorney general. thank you, mr. chairman. i will just say to mr. whitaker, my question in a normal oversight committee, it would be vastly different than the direction i m going to go. because we have kind of wandered into this other stream over here. i m going to ask you some questions. the long-standing constitutionally-based department of justice policy holds that a sitting president cannot be indicted. that s based on the last review under the clinton and administration. is that still in effect, or has a change?
President
Justice
Counsel
Everything
Advice
Department-of-justic
Momentum
Sessions-wasn-t
United-states-attorney
Mr
Chairman
Issues
mr. tabet. mr. gohmert. mr. jordan. mr. buck. mr. radcliffe. miss ruby votes they. mr. gates. mr. johnson. mr. bigs. mr. big s votes no. harris: as we watch the roll call, i want to bring in andy mccarthy, former federal prosecutor who s with me today and outnumbered. what is fastening about this, andy, is that we are talking about whether matthew whitaker, the acting ag before this house judiciary committee today, should have to answer the question which we didn t even hear of the total question but it had to do something with bias at this point. so they are doing a roll call. why is this necessary? the problem is they want to probe about his background. i think what they are trying to do is give him the confirmation
Mr
Miss
Hgohmert
Buck
Radcliffe
Jordan
Tabet
Votes
Roll-call
Hank-johnson
Gates
Andy-mccarthy
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.