Page 3 - Fung Fung News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Fung fung. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Fung Fung Today - Breaking & Trending Today
See if they would be consistent with the ceqa analysis that was conducted for the site and consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. The only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. In this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. The rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. Im available for any questions you may have. Mr. Teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where were at now . So i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holders presentation, the height district here its a 40 foot height district, but because its rh1 dd, you take a 45 angle from either the front Property Line or the front set bac ....
With the ceqa analysis that was conducted for the site and consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. The only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. In this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. The rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. Im available for any questions you may have. Mr. Teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where were at now . So i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holders presentation, the height district here its a 40 foot height district, but because its rh1 dd, you take a 45 angle from either the front Property Line or the front set back line, and that can go up to 35 ....
See if they would be consistent with the ceqa analysis that was conducted for the site and consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. The only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. In this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. The rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. Im available for any questions you may have. Mr. Teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where were at now . So i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holders presentation, the height district here its a 40 foot height district, but because its rh1 dd, you take a 45 angle from either the front Property Line or the front set bac ....
Johnson Commission Johnson i would make a motion to move the project for. I think commissioner moore if im interpreting correctly were on the path to potentially having findings to adjust the project it for talk about setting the Building Back further because there would be some findings are there but with the deck argument, based on the where the original building is and this plan here i just conceal we would come within the findings [inaudible] for this part. So id like to move that we prove the project. President fung theres already a motion. Theres a motion thats been seconded that eliminates 3 feet from the funds the sod on the top floor. So, commissioner johnson that has to be amended. Commissioner moore the architect will indicate theres no way president fung moved and seconded. Any other questions commissioner . On a motion to approve the project as proposed commis ....